Résumés(1)

Au coeur des Carpates, il est un monde de légendes et de mystères : la Transylvanie... Une terre où le mal règne en maître absolu, où le danger rôde dès le coucher du soleil, où prennent corps les monstres qui hantent nos cauchemars les plus secrets. Van Helsing est un ténébreux professeur et chasseur de monstres. Sa mission l'amène à affronter de terribles êtres, parmi lesquels le loup-garou, la créature de Frankenstein ou encore le comte Dracula, qui, depuis des générations, persécute la famille de l'intrépide et aristocratique Anna Valerious. (texte officiel du distributeur)

(plus)

Vidéo (1)

Bande-annonce

Critiques (6)

POMO 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français J'adore la composition de l'image, l'art du cinéma, Kate Beckinsale et les effets numériques, tant qu'ils sont utilisés de manière raisonnable (Jurrasic Park). Sans parler des films d'horreur classiques. Mais je ne peux pas aimer Van Helsing. J'attends de ce film qu'il ait de la magie, un toucher de réalité. Van Helsing a coûté 150 millions de dollars et a suscité en moi les mêmes émotions et intérêt pour les personnages que sa bande-annonce d'une minute à peine. Un vide émotionnel, un désintérêt total pour ce qui se passe à l'écran. Les effets numériques n'ont pas évolué d'un poil, ils maintiennent une qualité déséquilibrée et il y en a tellement que nous cessons de croire au monde qu'ils nous présentent. Et Richard Roxburgh est le plus grand échec de casting de l'année. Deux étoiles seulement pour un prologue impressionnant, de beaux décors et une blague avec une vache. ()

gudaulin 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I dare say that there is no significant difference between the favorably received Mummy and the criticized Van Helsing. It is equally fast, skillful, and superficial without an internal story logic. The difference, expressed in my case by one star, lies in the level of self-awareness, where The Mummy follows in the footsteps of Indiana Jones with its style, while Van Helsing does not want to entertain, but rather to impress to its own detriment. As it takes itself too seriously, all the shortcomings of Sommers' directing style are more easily revealed. Overall impression 40%. ()

Annonces

Lima 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Stephen, Kate and Hugh made a cake that is not very palatable. It looks like a burger from McDonald’s and it tastes like that too: it’s not very juicy and too crowded with toppings. If I were to take it as laid-back popcorn entertainment, there would have to be a clearer sign that the film doesn't take itself too seriously. If I were to be afraid, Sommers would have to be able to create an atmosphere of tension. Instead, I was bored, waiting to see what kind of rubbish the director would unload on me again, and the few scares didn't save it. And when it comes to the action, well, I have nothing against a crossbow shooting arrows like a machine gun, but in a film that is supposed to be a sort of homage to old horror movies (in the words of the director), it feels like a punch in the face. And for me to have fun, there would have to be at least some funny moments. Sommers evokes lightness with exaggerated action scenes that lack wit and logic (but whatever). And Dracula? I don't understand why the Lord of Darkness has to look like the frontman of some faded pop rock band like Bon Jovi. Murnau's Nosferatu, lay your hand of vengeance on that barbaric Sommers and taste his arteries. He’s calling for it! ()

lamps 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Little kids will love Van Helsing, it's cute, colourful, fast-paced, likeable, and can draw on the rich "monster-movie" mythology that they love so much, with apparently every single drop being squeezed out of it. Teens will respect Van Helsing because it stars the cool Wolverine guy, Kate Beckinsale struts around the set in tight pants, and because the plot leaves no room for any pesky emotions and merely furiously presents Sommers' most B-movie homage to a popular and nearly extinct film genre. On the other hand, adults who have seen a few fantasy flicks in their lifetime will hate and laugh at Van Helsing because it's visually overstuffed, emotionally barren, blandly acted, and has a script that was either concocted by someone on drugs or someone who needed to make a quick buck for drugs. I’m giving it three stars only because I was a little boy, or a teenager, when I watched it on VHS, and a thick whiff of nostalgia comes over me every time Hugh Jackman raises his crossbow, or when the camera hungrily takes in Kate Beckinsale's backside, or when Richard Roxburgh, playing Dracula, tries to resurrect his ugly offspring, distant relatives of the little zombie from Jackson's Braindead. Alan Silvestri deserves the biggest praise, the other stars should forget about this overpriced trip to Transylwood. 55% ()

novoten 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Nonstop shredder, exaggerated affect and absolutely unmastered narrative tone in combination with excellent action, unbeatable fighter Jackman and sufficient exaggeration. I try to avoid phrases like "popcorn entertainment" if possible, but Van Helsing is precisely the epitome of action-adventure certainty. ()

Photos (142)