Retour vers le futur

Les années quatre-vingt-dix, le sommet de la collaboration entre Spielberg / Zemeckis... Extrêmement amusant, original, intelligent, cultivé, avec des jokes délicates et des idées profondes. Un film qui ne fait pas honte aux termes "popcorn" ou "(ultra)happyend". Pourquoi ne les fait-on plus comme ça aujourd'hui ? Pourquoi vivons-nous dans une époque si déprimante ? Si je n'avais pas été touché par des films jusqu'à présent et l'aurais évalué à l'époque de sa création, je lui donnerais 5 étoiles. (03/11/2008)

Had I seen it for the first time in my teenage years when I enjoyed similar stories, I would probably give it a definite five stars. Unfortunately, I watched Zemeckis' legendary sci-fi for the first time last week, which killed a bit of my enthusiasm. The story is very entertaining, some of the gags and situations are very nice, but I don’t really care for the "teenage spirit" and the unmistakable aesthetics of the 80's. Both of the title characters are really good, and the game with the influence of past actions on future things is also fun. This is a very successful hybrid with a great idea and a quality script. But aging… what can you do? (19/09/2006)

The movie that will always make me love time paradoxes. Michael J. Fox is cool whether he's skateboarding, playing guitar, drifting with a car that I always envied him for, or escaping back to where Jennifer is waiting. (25/12/2005)

One great thing has happened to me with this review, and I might be the only one among you. I am evaluating without any emotion, as it is only now that I have seen this film – in 2011. So no nostalgia. This film is very silly. If someone were to make something like this today, they would be crucified. Even Pirates of the Caribbean, silly as it is, is a little bit better than this (and it is also nonsense, by the way). (14/08/2011)

It's been almost thirty years, but this sci-fi adventure comedy still holds its place among the genre's elite, and there's no sign of that changing. After all, it's not every day that such an original, entertaining and perfectly thought-out script is born in the minds of screenwriters, even under the guidance of directorial wizards like Robert Zemeckis and Steven Spielberg. Just great, I can't but praise it. The visuals are stunning even after all these years, the unravelling of the story is simply flawless, and the duo of M.J. Fox and Christopher Lloyd were probably born for this legendary three-part series, and the way the creators dealt with the bar they set for the second part is truly incredible. 100% (29/09/2012)

Une téléportation instantanée dans les années quatre-vingt. Un film impeccable qui nous fait toujours passer un excellent moment. Un film sur des retours qu’il est bon de retourner voir de temps en temps. Un film de plus que je vois enfin au grand écran. [KVIFF 2022] (23/07/2022)

I delayed watching Back to the Future perhaps too long, because I had already watched some time travel films, so Robert Zemeckis' breakthrough film did not impress me as much as it did the audience of that time. This is not to say that I didn't enjoy Marty's Journey to the Past and Back, but quite the opposite. I liked the setting and the concept of the 50s, and in fact the 80s stylization, which I like to return to in films (whether it be the setting or when the film was produced). The high school storyline doesn't outright surprise anyone, but it was hilarious to watch the confrontation between the 50s school kids and the 80s kid who was simply three decades "more advanced". Besides the scifi-comedy line, the film also appealed to me for its action, especially in the final quarter. Of the actors, I was most amused by the goofy Christopher Lloyd, but the others also had something going for them – the "modern" Michael J. Fox, the coyly sensual Lea Thompson or the endearingly awkward Crispin Glover. Perhaps the only thing that bothered me was the visible make-up of the actors/characters. Otherwise, I was satisfied with the film, even though I was unable to fully appreciate its qualities and cult status. (08/04/2021)

I like the admitted value connection here between the 50s and the 80s, where you're actually fighting for position in the bourgeois suburbs, not breaking out of it. Back to the Future is actually a Reaganesque ode to neighborhood and conservative certainties, where one can twist one's entire life in the right direction with a well-timed punch, while keeping one's integrity in check, and if there's one thing to rely on, it's science. Oh, and they're taking the invention of rock 'n' roll away from black people, which is actually fucking hilarious nowadays. I totally understand how seductive it must have been at the time and actually is now, especially since the movie has such perfect sequences (the concert!), exuberant acting (Lloyd!), and a great script. Value-wise, though, it's as much a guilty pleasure for me to watch the film as it is to be entertained by constructivist or normalization films. (10/05/2021)

Once again, I went back in time to remind myself, after about thirty years (since the last time I saw the film), how Marty McFly went thirty years back in time and then returned thirty years into the future. The fact is, the movie didn't have the same impact on me as it did decades ago, and I blame that mainly on the passing of time, which changes my perception of the world. And even though I must admit that one of the reasons I like the movie is nostalgia, it's true that I still thoroughly enjoyed it today because Michael J. Fox portrayed the main character brilliantly. I much prefer Christopher Lloyd as a slightly unhinged visionary rather than Uncle Fester. To sum it up, the film has flaws, given its age, but there aren't enough to spoil my overall impression. / Lesson learned: Always put your name on your underwear. 5* (24/06/2023)

The film is based on the idea that it is possible to change our present by changing our past. Causality is respected here, of course, for the purposes of the screenplay, but in this case, it doesn't matter at all because it works perfectly. Additionally, there are two actors who give the film its soul. Michael J. Fox is an actor who you can't help but like, and Christopher Lloyd and his character Emmett Brown are so wonderfully eccentric that he has become a literal iconic mad scientist. Directed by Robert Zemeckis, this is truly a well-thought-out film that will entertain you, even if you're not a big fan of sci-fi. Among other things, Zemeckis shows what he has always excelled at - special effects sequences. They are truly well done, and one wouldn't even believe that the film is almost thirty years old. I was completely unnecessary in my fear of the film because it is really a great example of what fun and intelligent sci-fi can look like. (19/11/2013)