La Guerre des étoiles
Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope
Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope
Réalisation:
George LucasScénario:
George LucasPhotographie:
Gilbert TaylorMusique:
John WilliamsActeurs·trices:
Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Peter Cushing, Alec Guinness, Anthony Daniels, Peter Mayhew, David Prowse, Alex Mccrindle (plus)VOD (4)
Résumés(1)
Dans une galaxie lointaine, une guerre civile fait rage entre les forces du bien et du mal. Une alliance rebelle essaie de lutter contre la dictature instaurée par les Sith mais la princesse Leia est capturée. A l’aide de ses compagnons droïdes, Luke Skywalker, jeune fermier rêvant de partir à l’aventure, tente de lui venir en aide. (LaCinetek)
(plus)Critiques (9)
It has cardboard models and visual effects made on a shoestring, but this episode is far more impressive than episodes I and II, which are packed with digital effects. This is not nostalgia on my part, but the fact that Lucas has forgotten how to make a good film. If it's true that he wants to cut newly shot scenes with Natalie Portman into the original episodes (nothing against her otherwise), Lucas is done for good. That would be a crime against a legend.
()
For me, this instalment of the Star Wars is the one I watched the most. I watched it over and over again as a child and I was always satisfied. The story was so unique that it filled my free time for many micro decades of time. And it will probably still entertain me for some time. The first, respectively the fourth episode, has a pretty simple story as it introduces the world and the characters in it. You either fall in love with it, or you should not even watch the other instalments.
()
Pleasant adventure that gradually got out of control in the following parts, reaching strongly grand dimensions. Although Lucas relies more on humor and details in the first half rather than on the narrative pace, it is still not very difficult to engage in his game. However, the main part of my admiration lies in the fact that he earned the right to shoot this exactly in 1977. A space fairytale with a wise old man, naive boy, mischievous smuggler, beautiful princess, chatty android, beeping tin can, and most of all, with the best villain in the universe. The most modest installment in the series is ultimately the weakest after years, but despite the noticeable flaws, it still has a huge dose of nostalgia. 70%
()
To some extent, George Lucas and Steven Spielberg shared the ambition to revive old genres for the audiences of a new era. Whereas Spielberg turned those genres on their head (fascination with aliens instead of fear of them), however, Lucas strived to create new variations that would fill contemporary audiences with the same or even more intense wonder and fascination as the old works did for him when he was a boy. Lucas’s updating of old, naïve sci-fi adventure movies like Flash Gordon and Buck Rogers resulted in a pure-blooded space opera in which extensive political wrangling is merely a backdrop for a fantastically heroic story set in space. The naïve tale of a young hero who ventures out into the world to rescue a princess stands primarily on the engagingly colourful world of a galaxy far, far away and adventurous escapades – in other words, the same elements with which Lucas’s influences fascinated their audiences. Compared to those earlier films’ naïve special effects, however, Star Wars prides itself on eliciting amazement with revolutionary tricks. That may be one of the reasons that, with the advent of CGI, Lucas painstakingly and repeatedly refined the original trilogy, which, however, nullified the image of Star Wars as a milestone in the historical development of special effects and cinematography. Much gratitude and appreciation thus go to Harmy’s Despecialized Edition, which allows us to again marvel at the original form of all three episodes and appreciate the tremendous leaps in development between the individual instalments.
()
One film legend says that there was a fundamental difference in the approach to the world of cinema among the three most influential filmmakers of the 70s, namely Spielberg, Coppola, and Lucas. While Spielberg and Coppola literally lived for movies, exhaustively watched the performances of acclaimed film classics in film clubs, passionately discussed cinema with similarly affected individuals late into the night, and tried to push the world of film forward, Lucas was an enthusiastic reader of outdated comics, a viewer of 1950s TV space operas, and film theory was inherently foreign to him. However, he was able to capture the essence of popular culture and the transformation of the film audience from the 40s to the 70s, when the average age of cinema-goers continued to decrease. At the same time, due to sociological processes and the enrichment of society, there was a change in the perception of film. The infantilization fully manifested itself and the concept of a family film with a lower standard prevailed to be understood by a wider range of potential viewers. This is how Star Wars came into being, where a fairytale was wrapped in cosmic technology and the nonsense of the then-popular New Age movement. Lucas filmed it as visually and naively as possible, and precisely because of that, it had such a penetrating success. What succeeds attracts attention and the desire to imitate, and at a certain stage, when it becomes a cult, it is practically unquestionable and by itself carries the seal of quality regardless of its content. I saw the first three films of the famous series at an age when I found the motifs and execution, especially the "intellectual superstructure," laughable. Otherwise, the course of events is such that you see it for the first time at the age of 8-9, and then with an iron regularity, so you grow up with it and it has emotional and nostalgic value for you. Even if I grew up with it, I still would have most likely become a fan of the Star Trek series, which, despite its clichés, naivety, and the ideological basis that stems from multiculturalism, represents an honest work from the sci-fi genre. Star Wars only shares the space settings with the sci-fi genre. It is a fairytale fantasy that is neither clever nor innovative nor brilliantly directed. The later three episodes of the series are loaded with bombastic special effects, but they are more childish than anything, and they also lack the confident ironic detachment that emanates from every smirk of Han Solo. His portrayal by Harrison Ford somewhat resembles the much more pronounced ironic detachment of the Indiana Jones character. Personally, the entire series has nothing to offer me, and although there are understandably significant nuances between each film, what bothers me, such as the frenzied waving of lightsabers, the babbling about the Force, and the cute plush creatures as extraterrestrials, are typical of all the episodes. Therefore, this commentary applies to all parts of the Star Wars series. Overall impression: 20% for the set design.
()
(moins)
(plus)
A sci-fi classic that it’s now difficult to watch. It’s naive, lacks dynamics and visual attractiveness. Maybe I'm not the right fan. An immortal classic for someone, average for me. Destiny or even genius, I personally definitely don't see it.
()
There are few films that I can say without exaggeration that I know by heart, including their soundtracks. This is one of them, and even though I know it so well that I just can't find anything new in it anymore, I still enjoy watching it. Again and again. It's a beautiful space fairytale (I wouldn't really use the term sci-fi - at least not until someone invents the lightsaber) with a great atmosphere, for everyone, big and small, with likable actors, revolutionary special effects, and a bombastic John Williams, without whom it would all be half-hearted at best. That's what films are for, to take the audience to fantastic places they will never get to themselves.
()
A film that needs no reviews. As an introduction, it doesn't reach the dramatic heights of the following two episodes, and some elements are bound to feel a little dated, but it's still an exemplary definition of a legend in that fickle and demanding art called cinema. What's more, I feel that the more you watch it, the more the characters and the unique mythology grow on you, so maybe next time it will be worth five stars.
()
Although it is not as strong as when I first saw "Star Wars," still it fits so beautifully. This is simply a masterpiece of sci-fi in the sense of how Lucas was able to create such a rich universe with this one film, not to mention the other movies. Right from the beginning, his intention is to immerse you in something big, and he succeeds.
()