Résumés(1)

Un groupe d'explorateurs plus différents les uns que les autres s'aventurent au cœur d'une île inconnue du Pacifique, aussi belle que dangereuse. Ils ne savent pas encore qu'ils viennent de pénétrer sur le territoire de Kong... (Warner Bros. FR)

Vidéo (20)

Bande-annonce 11

Critiques (11)

POMO 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Vous trouverez la version abrégée du film avec tous les "wao" à côté de la section des vidéos. Il s'appelle "Trailer". Scénario pour 5 dollars. Godzilla était un film sombre et stylé, Kong est une gelée colorée. Pas une seule émotion ni aucune tension. Le singe entre en scène de manière rapide et incisive, mais la surprise tue la connaissance des bandes-annonces. De même, l'émerveillement des monstres prédécoupés que nous avons tous vus dedans. Dommage. L'effort pour recréer l'atmosphère des mondes perdus des années 50 et 60 est présent, cela convient à Hiddleston en aventurier (avec Brie Larson cela aurait fonctionné dans un meilleur scénario) et John C. Reilly est le point fort du film. Seul Samuel Jackson ne sait pas ce qu'il fait ici avec son fanatique militant, dans son personnage, un boucher comme Stephen Lang d'Avatar serait mieux fonctionné. ()

MrHlad 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Kong: Skull Island is very different than it is presented in trailers. It has much closer resemblance to a classic adventure film, and those expecting the seriousness and maturity hinted at in the trailers will not find it. That said, Jordan Vogt-Roberts, an debutant blockbuster director, occasionally delivers some very nice shots and handles the epic monster battles flawlessly, and there are more of them than you would expect. Unfortunately, when Kong disappears from the scene and it comes to the human characters, it becomes significantly worse. For a moment, the film tackles Samuel L. Jackson's war traumas from Vietnam very seriously (and quite impressively), only to change into John C. Reilly's comedic relief the next minute. And in the meantime, a boring Loki and a bunch of other people run around, whom you really won't care about. Overall, it's okay, but I won't deny a slight disappointment. I suppose I'll watch a compilation of the battles at most in a year, but the entire film will be quite difficult. ()

Annonces

3DD!3 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais A rather weak screenplay, balanced by excellent tricks and fine actors. A movie buff’s enthusiasm is evident in Jordan Vogt-Roberts’ work as director, and lots of great ideas and situations are just what I hoped for. Unfortunately, some catalysts leading to these situations don’t make absolute sense (very conveniently located chains and ship’s propeller in the last fight, gas grenades and the simple stupidity of some characters). This is a great shame, because it really spoils the effort. Interesting casting is confronted by a screenplay where for instance the wonderful Sam L. Jackson’s behavior occasionally defies common sense. But all it needs is a little more depth to his motivation. ()

Marigold 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I have an idea. Let's make another version of King Kong, but this time in a Vietnam War style. - All right, what's it going to be about? - That giant ape. - Wait, but the story... - Yeah, the story, it's secondary. If we don't know, we'll put Black Sabbath or Led Zeppelin in there and some silhouettes in the backlight. - Isn't that too little? - No! We'll put Samuel L. Jackson in there, too. He will always say some awfully deep things and look like a crazy Maca Wind. Something between Colonel Kurzt and Captain Ahab, but blacker. - Okay, but what if it has runtime of almost two hours? – Then we’ll put a lot of useless characters in there who can be eaten by some giant beast. - Fine, sounds fun, green light. ()

Malarkey 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I was looking forward to a great chillout that was alluring me with its premise, digital effects and a mix of actors that under usual circumstances cannot disappoint. In this case the biggest problem lies in the fact that the scriptwriter didn’t properly work out the individual characters, so the only interesting one is Samuel L. Jackson, who really acts, and John C. Reilly, who has some cool lines here and there. Otherwise it’s a military slasher in a similar vein like the legendary Predator, the only difference is that nobody in this movie is able to hold a candle to Arnold Schwarzenegger. Catchphrases are missing, even the whole spirit of the movie is missing, so it is just another mediocre digital film from Hollywood. ()

Photos (148)