Résumés(1)

Lorsque la tristement célèbre Faille de San Andreas finit par s'ouvrir, et par provoquer un séisme de magnitude 9 en Californie, un pilote d'hélicoptère de secours en montagne et la femme dont il s'est séparé quittent Los Angeles pour San Francisco dans l'espoir de sauver leur fille unique. Alors qu'ils s'engagent dans ce dangereux périple vers le nord de l'État, pensant que le pire est bientôt derrière eux, ils ne tardent pas à comprendre que la réalité est bien plus effroyable encore... (Warner Bros. FR)

(plus)

Vidéo (14)

Bande-annonce 4

Critiques (12)

POMO 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Contribution révolutionnaire et non-klisé au genre auquel personne ne s'attendait de Warner. Une blague à la Emmerich et une perspective également, là où Roland est le roi. Les personnages sont bien, contrairement à l'année dernière dans "Dans l'œil du cyclone". Et même mieux que dans "Poséidon". Donc tout va bien, un métier décent sans erreurs ni surprises. ()

Lima 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais The Rock is cool, no doubt about it. Otherwise, this is just a bunch of terrible, boring clichés, dull dialogue, amateurish acting and overwrought CGI; just everything I hate so heartily about the current mass production of the dream factory. And three people wrote the script for this? This shows that some professions in Hollywood are even easier than receiving welfare. I never thought I'd say this, but I miss Emmerich! ()

Annonces

Malarkey 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais The Americans tend to shoot a disaster movie once in a while, cry their eyes out and show Americanism in its harshest form. And they usually take down Los Angeles or San Francisco. It lies on two tectonic plates, so it’s strongly fitting for a similar movie. For many decades now. Fortunately, San Andreas doesn’t deviate from the standard and performs solid popcorn entertainment, which is supported by Hulk Dwayne and solid CGI. It’s almost a surprise that a similarly tuned movie wasn’t made by Emmerich, but by the talented Peyton instead, because he massacred the surroundings very well. ()

Marigold 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais My guess is that the screenplay was rewritten six times which, as a result, is not able to maintain even a hint of consistency / escalation in both storylines (family / seismologist). Horrible dialogues, rubber acting, tricks that can be bought for 100 million today, amusement park directing. For 4DX cinema, it can work as a tech demo. I am giving the film a single star just for its hint of an interesting ideological storyline, in which the almost shocking selfish concentration of the man responsible for saving others on his family plays a role. There has not been such a strictly individualistic disaster film for a long time that would place the restoration of America purely on the shoulders of capable individuals who fight only their private wars. Unfortunately, even this factor is there purely for laughter. This movie as broken as the world it depicts. The earthquake comes as a divine punishment when the characters have nothing more to say. And that's basically the case all the time with San Andreas. On my Richter scale of nonsense, it’s a pure ten. ()

Photos (49)