The Human Centipede II (Full Sequence)

L'extrémiste Tom Six remplit en quelque sorte un vide dans l'histoire du cinéma avec son deuxième film "The Human Centipede". Il brise les tabous (femme enceinte, enfant) et son idée remarquable du premier film pousse l'extrême à un tel point que seuls les ignorants (et les non-initiés du sous-genre "splatter") ne peuvent pas apprécier sa capacité à fusionner les éléments d'horreur et de violence ultime avec dégoût pour créer une forme aussi surréaliste et comique. Ce n'est pas le Peter Jackson des débuts, il n'a pas son sens de la perspective. Cependant, avec une réalisation professionnelle et un personnage principal qui agit de manière réaliste, par sa perversion et sa méchanceté, cela dérange des zones sensibles et jusque-là inexplorées de l'esprit. Bien sûr, vous devez être le bon public cible. Déjà à l'adolescence, j'explorais curieusement l'esprit de leurs créateurs à travers des films tels que "Cannibal Holocaust", "Pink Flamingos" ou "NEKROmantik" - ce qu'ils font, pourquoi et comment ils tournent leurs films. Et dans la marée incessante d'Hollywood, leur originalité m'amusait. La deuxième partie de "The Human Centipede" m'a également amusé, elle est plus développée sur le plan cinématographique et artistique que la première, elle ne s'ennuie jamais et regorge d'idées qui se rassemblent pour un "final grandiose". (27/10/2014)

Has Tom Six made a filthy meta horror film about how harmless perverts can become dangerous psychopaths after watching a filthy horror film? Probably not, because the last scene (i.e. the most cliché twist ever) allows for a completely opposite interpretation. I’d probably be one of the few who liked more the first and tighter part. It was more about the victims, I was able to relate to them and was mentally tramped by their sad fate. The second part, in contrast, moves only around the perverted protagonists and we don’t get to know anything about the victims. The first part is better as horror with a story, the second is more a probe into perverted thoughts, and I’m not saying that this is bad, it’s just that personally it doesn’t suit me. Martin (the protagonist) is portrayed very convincingly repulsive, which is one of the things that both parts have in common – Tom Six has a good nose for proper perverts. The rest of the actors, on the other hand, aren’t that good, and the film is not particularly well made, either, though the way it relies on brutality and nastiness it’s effective. So, four stars, but not as certain as the first part. PS: If the third part is to be even more meta, maybe some outraged film critic will sew together director Tom Six, Dieter Laser (Dr. Helter from the first part) and Laurence R. Harvey (Martin from the second part). I will give it five stars if it’s shot even worse :-D Edit: I’m reducing the rating to 3 stars, the memories of the film fizzled out surprisingly quickly. (30/10/2011)

If the first episode was an innocent first date with a slightly peculiar partner, I would call the second one an outright fuckfest with the most disgusting sexual deviant imaginable. And if the first film – intimate, psychologically believable and emotionally quite intense – gave me the impression that Tom Six can weave stories, the second convincingly disabused me of that belief. The Second Human Centipede is admittedly brilliantly atmospheric, optimally morbid in its setting and main characters, even in the scenes free of physical violence, and boasts an extremely realistic psychopath whose daily life alone would make for quite a few horror films. But all the promising themes merge into a mindless carnage of such a disgusting and exaggerated nature that the only real emotion that remains is utter disgust, not at the actions of the "hero" (which was clearly the purpose), but at the actions of the director, who has the audacity to serve us civilized people such cheap and mindless filth. In addition to being supremely ugly, the film is also unimaginably nonsensical in terms of narrative logic – even a film primarily built on brutality shouldn’t have so many flaws and logical holes – and even Six's hilarious attempt to enrich the narrative with a noble twist fails to cover those flaws up. I finished watching it out of pure curiosity as to how far the filmmakers were willing to go in their visual openness, and I can honestly say that they went so far as to make the film worthy of being banned. This is not normal, really. (11/11/2014)

Voici l’inévitable conséquence à tout le ramdam provoqué par la sortie du film initial. Tom Six a laissé libre cours à ses fantasmes pervers en offrant aux fans de son concept de mille-pattes humain ce qu’ils ont demandé. Aussi se retrouve-t-on avec une cochonnerie outrancière, maculée de m*rde et dépourvue d’intrigue que beaucoup semblent apprécier, mais qu’encore plus de gens réprouvent avec dégoût. Pour moi, c'est l'exemple typique du délire filmique marginal qui ne m’intéresse absolument pas et sur lequel je n’ai aucune intention de revenir par la suite. (16/11/2019)

Martin is not a sophisticated idiot like Dr. Heiter. He is just a small, fat little man who struggles with his victims dying, cannot perform surgeries, is frustrated because of it, and his peers do not help him much. In the end, however, he succeeds, he manages to do it. So what is different about the new part? Better? Firstly, the centipede is significantly longer as it now has ten segments. Secondly, it points out, at least initially, how much the media can influence us. Is this what the film is trying to tell us? Or is it all just in the filth that tries to shock us? (09/12/2013)