Charlie's Angels - Les anges se déchaînent

L'action est confuse et névrotique, une parodie de films embarrassante, l'intrigue pratiquement inexistante. Si quelqu'un mélangeait les bobines de film au cinéma, vous n'y prêteriez pas du tout attention. Si ce film connaît un succès commercial, cela signifiera le début de la fin de la bonne entertainment cinématographique américaine - car pour réaliser quelque chose de similaire, on n'a besoin de rien d'autre qu'un gros budget. Je suis content de mourir avec la génération actuelle et de ne pas être témoin d'une époque où 90% de la production hollywoodienne sera régie par cette équation. (20/06/2003)

Yeah, it’s awful bollocks. But can I honestly be mad at a film that openly admits its awfulness in every scene, doesn't take itself seriously at all, and is filmed at a killer pace that doesn't let you get bored? Sometimes, with a certain amount of detachment, you can actually enjoy this kind of bullshit. Which is not to say that I seek out this type of entertainment. (29/10/2005)

Bigger, rougher, and more action-packed may not always be harmful and ruin the impression of the first part. With the angels, there is nothing to ruin because I avoid the first one by several kilometers. The stupid bantering is surprisingly bearable this time, and the action is not only watchable but even great. Moreover, the central trio gained a lot of sex appeal with a shovel. (07/08/2006)

I enjoyed these Angels perhaps even more than the first one, it's just a pity Bill Murray didn't attend, though he probably knew why. In other words, it's bullshit, but beautiful. And there’s John Cleese. And Demi Moore. Yeah, and Lucy, Drew, and Cameron...there's a lot there:-))) (04/06/2009)