Frankenstein

Un classique contradictoire. Boris Karloff est excellent et les scènes individuelles sont magnifiquement filmées, mais elles sont quelque peu mécaniques, sans vie, assemblées de manière peu convaincante en un tout monochrome sans saveur, dont le handicap cardinal est l'absence de musique. Celle-ci aurait certainement augmenté à la fois la charge émotionnelle du film et la cohésion de son montage désordonné. Le film Bride of Frankenstein, qui est une suite, représente un grand pas en avant sous tous les aspects. (16/09/2003)

Spectacular, of course. The backdrop, full of expressionist nonlinearity and innovation, may seem ridiculous to today's viewer, but anyone with a love for black-and-white magic will succumb to the magic of Whale's film. Boris Karloff's performance is absolutely unforgettable, the way he breathed life into the monster so that it scares (his entrée in the film is grandiose) and at the same time arouses emotions (his futile desire to understand humanity!), this is acting mastery... James Whale created a classic of world horror and a film that will probably forever be written in the annals of cinema. What would film monsters be without Boris Karloff's unforgettable (originally supposedly greenish) mask? Even all the imperfections of the film today complete Frankenstein's myth... (29/01/2004)

For me, despite its qualities, Frankenstein is rather disappointing. Even though at first glance everything is as it should be. After all these years it isn’t even ridiculous for a moment, all roles are acted outstandingly, it’s well filmed, has a pleasant Universal Studios look about it and it isn’t even tedious. From the point of view of today’s spoiled viewer I could object a little to the absence of music, but that wouldn’t be altogether fair. The core of the problem is that it’s badly written (I won’t say “adapted", since it has almost nothing to do with the book). And nothing happens the whole way through. Nothing at all. Which indicates that there a few “big" scenes missing. Of course, with the exception in the form of the notorious and also perfect scene of “Frankie meets little girl". But this scene is so perfect that it does the movie a disservice in that it emphasizes just how much potential remains wasted elsewhere. Which changes nothing about the fact that it is a perfectly made picture that is rightly considered to be a gem of world cinema. (07/03/2008)

I don't know what it is, but I remember Frankenstein being much more impressive... The opening half hour in particular is almost boring in places. But with Boris Karloff, my need to yawn disappears, the scene with the little girl makes me shudder, and the finale with the mill is perfect. And did you know that it was only today that I realized that there is no music in the film?__P.S. Again, I know the comparison is unfair, but the version made by Kenneth Branagh is unbeatable. (11/08/2013)

A time-honoured classic that doesn’t have much to offer today. If you don't know about it, I’d recommend Brannagh's 1994 remake, which has a better cast, is more psychologically precise and more emotionally varied as a result. This is rather another mandatory entry in the textbook, one that everyone skips without being noticed and without punishment. 60% (01/05/2014)