I, Frankenstein

Je n’aurais pas imaginé donner plus de trois étoiles à ce film, mais je tenais à le voir. Les scènes d’action sont relativement réussies, mais tout est gâché par la médiocrité du scénario. C’est en partie pompé sur Underworld et pas seulement en ce qui concerne l’histoire, mais également dans le casting. D’un autre côté, Bill Nighy est l’un des aspects les plus positifs du film. Par contraste, je trouve qu’Aaron Eckhart ne convient pas du tout à son rôle et qu’il y est plutôt maladroit. Yvonne, c’est la demi-étoile qui fait monter la note finale. Quant à Kenneth Branagh et Mary Shelley, ils pourraient souffrir d’une légère crise de nerfs en regardant ce film. (23/04/2014)

It’s been a long time since I saw so stupid that I wasn’t impressed by a single thing. Even the effects aren't worth mentioning, let alone praising. Those 49 CZK for the DVD were too much. (11/03/2015)

Predictable, emotionally boring with empty characters, where at first glance it's clear how each person will behave. I don't know if this shows that the casting was done amazingly or simply because they took traditionally typecast actors. I think this is more of a joke on the audience, a test to see what they can still handle and how many times. Action horrors were doing quite well recently, so why not copy a ten-year-old idea and try it again. Well, it didn't work out according to the box office. The reference to Mary Shelley's work here is rather mocking. (13/03/2014)

Miserably filmed idiocy where ugly stone monkeys call the beefy Eckhart a monster. The war between ugly gargoyles and ridiculous demons couldn’t have been made duller. Poor special effects, boring action and, most importantly, confused story are the qualities of this "homage" to the Underworld franchise. (04/05/2018)