Résumés(1)

Riyad (Arabie Saoudite). Un attentat des plus sanglants jamais perpétrés contre des Occidentaux fait plus 100 morts et 200 blessés parmi les employés de la société pétrolière Gulf Oasis et leurs familles. Tandis que les bureaucrates de Washington discutent "droit d'ingérence" et "territorialité", l'agent du FBI Ronald Fleury et les membres de sa section d'intervention négocient un discret voyage de cinq jours en Arabie Saoudite pour identifier le cerveau de l'attentat.
Dès leur arrivée au Royaume, Fleury et les siens sont confrontés à l'hostilité des Saoudiens, qui prétendent mener seuls l'enquête. Entravés par un protocole tatillon et pressés par le temps, les quatre agents comprennent qu'ils doivent gagner au plus tôt la confiance de leurs homologues saoudiens, aussi décidés qu'eux à retrouver les terroristes... (texte officiel du distributeur)

(plus)

Vidéo (3)

Bande-annonce 1

Critiques (14)

POMO 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Un thriller techniquement solide et intelligent, à l'exception d'une conclusion acidulée, se joue ici sur un thème sérieux tout autant que sur une action réaliste et percutante. Cependant, dans l'action, Peter Berg est meilleur dans le final. C'est dommage aussi que le film se termine au moment où ça commence vraiment. Le spectateur reste ainsi amusé mais pas complètement satisfait. Avec le temps, "Le Royaume" vieillira comme par exemple "Bloodline". ()

MrHlad 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Total satisfaction. Peter Berg serves up an interesting story that looks at the issues of the Western and Arab worlds in a quite clever way. Visually, the film is top notch from the first to the last second, Jamie Foxx is superb, and the final action set-piece is something that makes you want to take cover from bullets. I can't wait to see it again. ()

Annonces

Isherwood 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Michael Mann has laid his guardian hands on Peter Berg and the result is a quite provocative contribution to the problem of the current sores of the Western world, i.e., terrorism emanating from Muslim countries. Yes, it's all driven by the mainstream, which doesn't allow it to be as biting in some ways as it might like, but the filmmakers still managed to go further than, for example, their colleagues with Blood Diamond. The film's train of thought is mainly that even an ordinary Muslim wants to be a peaceful person whose concerns are his faith and his own family, and that fanaticism is the work of others. Berg manages to imbue these interviews with a fair amount of authorial sensitivity, drawing decent truths about both worlds from the many words spoken. However, in order to avoid falling into boredom, he lets the actors deliver hard-hitting catchphrases and at the end, he serves up some major action that sits the viewer in their armchair in such a way that nothing that could match it this season will stick in the memory. The scene with the car-jacking and subsequent kidnapping is, in my opinion, the most effectively escalating scene of the year, which also ties in with the London station stakeout in The Bourne Ultimatum. As a person who studies the issues in the Middle East and terrorism, I was quite pleased with The Kingdom, but as a casual viewer, I was perfectly settled and entertained. PS: To say that it is mainly the work of Michael Mann is nonsense, if only for the different functionality and emotional impact of some scenes. It's like saying that Spielberg actually made Transformers and not Bay. ()

Marigold 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais The craft is excellent, Berg does a good job with the action, although it all seems so polished that it is impersonal. The schematism in the world vision can be carried away, you can feel how much the screenwriter tried to plastically see the problem. Not that it is completely successful - the overall message in the style of "we all have families and we love them, so we are just people" is pleasantly dulled by the final point. I don't know if the creators wanted to suppress that cleverly cynical message at the last minute, and I really didn't understand the choice of music. Given the acting and the really frenetic and swollen last twenty minutes, The Kingdom will definitely pay off... A mastered genre film, but Peter Berg still lacks considerable dose of individuality to achieve the brilliance of Mann or Scott. ()

Lima 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I pray that this is not a new filmmaking trend and a question comes to mind: Is everyone really going to unsuccessfully play second-rate Paul Greengrass from now on? The words of an overseas film critic who wrote that Berg invited a "permanently dancing monkey" to operate the camera sound true. Even in static shots, the chaotic shuffling of the camera from side to side, up and down, which, sitting about 10 m in front of the big screen, led to sore eyes and, after half an hour, I had the feeling I had overdosed on Kinedryl. Greengrass owns this filmmaking style, he's mastered it perfectly and gave Bourne an interesting flair. But in your case, Peter Berg, was it really necessary? Because otherwise the actors, led by the charismatic Foxx, were superb, the Saudi realism fantastic and the final action breathtaking in places. If Berg became convinced that his pseudo-documentary approach with a camera unleashed could draw the viewer more into the plot, in my case it completely missed the mark. The last two sentences of the film are great, a simple and yet so apt description of the never ending struggle between the Western world and the Islamic one! By the way, for the first time in my life I had the experience of being in the cinema completely alone! ()

Photos (26)