Résumés(1)

En l'an 3000, la Terre n'est plus qu'un desert, et l'homme une espece en voie de disparition. Mille ans auparavant, les feroces Psychlos ont envahi notre planete, aneanti ses defenses, rase ses villes et aboli ses institutions. Le chef de la securite des Psychlos, Terl, est un des personnages les plus redoutes de cette Terre barbare. Au milieu des Rocheuses, vit un jeune et heroique chasseur, Jonnie Goodboy Tyler, decide à redonner espoir et dignite aux siens. Capture, il rejoint la cohorte des esclaves de Terl. (ESC Distribution)

(plus)

Critiques (7)

Lima Boo !

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Scientology superstar Travolta smashed the piggy bank, donned a costume that would make him a first-class carnival attraction, and helped create a tribute to his guru, the founder of the Church of Scientology, L.R. Hubbard. This case, more than any other, shows that you can't make a good film out of an extremely crappy book. Especially when behind the camera is a man whose creative impotence is admirable and who can only manage to steal (or should I call it quote?) scenes from famous science fiction works (e.g. the slow-motion passage through the glass panes after being hit by a bullet is the blatant agony of the replicant Zhora from Scott's Blade Runner). Too bad the Church of Scientology itself hasn't been as "successful" as this piece of crap by Travolta, there would be one less influential zealot. ()

Isherwood Boo !

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Scott's imagination, Cameron's industrial design, and Besson's bizarreness meet in an acid mix that etches not only formal classics but also the audience’s good taste, with a poor script devoid of any proper logic or meaningful justification. If it didn’t take itself so deadly seriously, you’d think how cool those Scientologists are when they blow over $70 million for a good laugh, but I kind of like them that way. :) ()

3DD!3 Boo !

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I was not able to finish it. Weird script, awful dialogues, but it's all pretty messed up in terms of filmmaking, starting with the bad editing, and ending with the terrible visual effects. Yes I could have mocked Travolta the whole film, but I quite like him as an actor and was rather sorry. Not even rum could help. ()

D.Moore 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais For the effects, for the idea of a post-apocalyptic world with rastas piloting harriers, and for the funny John Travolta (I have a soft spot for his bad guys), who clearly didn't take the whole thing too seriously. ()

lamps Boo !

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I’m giving this film a Boo!, but I still highly recommend it to all of you. If you thought you've seen everything from cult gems to Uwe Boll's stinkiest shit, Battlefield Earth will prove you wrong. Both scriptwriters should be subjected to a thorough mental examination to see if they really meant it, or if they were just cruelly taking the piss out of all of us and the actors, too. But I'm afraid they really meant it, as did the film's producer and "brightest star" John Travolta, who supposedly took this pile of crap to the skies in public. And that's actually what bothered me the most about it. I was expecting it to be rubbish, but the fact that it pretended to be incredibly cool sci-fi and a hot competitor to The Matrix or 12 Monkeys pissed me off immensely and cemented the Boo! rating. I just don't understand how Travolta was able to lure in actors like Pepper and Whitaker when the film had no budget and looks so insanely amateurish in every aspect – terrible cinematography, editing, awful effects and absolutely horrible make-up that induced fits of laughter. Travolta tries to look tough and delivers one-liners like a proper bad guy, but his style of humour is probably the saddest in history, as well as his dreadlocks and computer gun (it's a good thing I didn't see it in the original, Trávníček's dubbing at least gave it some verve). The action scenes made me downright sick, instead being over in, say, a minute, the slow-motion shots stretched them to two. But like I’ve said, you have to see it for yourselves, because there's no way to adequately describe this. 15% ()

Goldbeater 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français S’il existait un prix pour les films faisant le plus grand usage des prises de vue en plan débullé, voire abusant des ralentis excessifs, Battlefield Earth : Terre champ de bataille serait le vainqueur incontesté. Rarement assiste-t-on à un tel déferlement de visuels surfaits qui sont pénibles à voir et dont on se passerait volontiers. Cette adaptation phare de l'œuvre du fondateur de l'Église de Scientologie est tragique à tous égards, mais je dois dire que la bataille finale des civilisations est une telle absurdité sans limites que j’en étais souffléet, après une heure et demie d'ennui, c’était une dose de divertissement. L'utilisation de miniatures y contribue grandement. ()