Résumés(1)

Poussé par sa femme Lynn, Porter, petit gangster teigneux fier d'être à son propre compte, accepte de faire équipe avec Val Resnick, malfrat sans scrupule qui ambitionne d'intégrer l'Organisation. Les deux hommes organisent un hold-up contre la mafia chinoise. L'opération tourne mal, Val s'approprie le magot avec la complicité de Lynn et abat froidement Porter qu'il laisse pour mort. Cinq mois plus tard, Porter refait surface, bien décidé à se venger et à récupérer son du. Il retrouve Resnick, le tue mais se retrouve face à l'Organisation qui veut venger Resnick. (texte officiel du distributeur)

(plus)

Critiques (10)

POMO 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Gangster prétentieux et têtu, Mel Gibson, une jolie blonde qui compte pour lui, un couple de policiers stupides et corrompus, beaucoup de violence, quelques éléments de sado/maso et surtout une douzaine de voyous dont la "coolitude" augmente à mesure qu'ils apprennent à les connaître, du pire voyou au plus dur et impitoyable boss. Le tout emballé dans des filtres nostalgiques, des nuances de caméra gris-bleu et un humour diablement noir. Un plaisir gourmand ! ()

Malarkey 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Mel Gibson did a hell of a job in this one. He’s tough, cool, rough, his mouth is full of great lines and he’s about to finish what he’d started. This is one hell of a payback. It actually doesn’t matter how Mel is going to go about is, what’s important is that he shoots enough bullets and that there are tons of dead bodies around him. It’s as simple as that. It might be a bit of a wannabe cool over-filtered action ride, but other than that it’s a wacky movie in the vein of Tarantino, which will keep you entertained for those almost two hours. ()

Marigold 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Helgeland managed a fairly decent mix of the gritty dude, Lethal Weapon, and the Tarantino crude gangster poetics, in which brutality is sort of danced, humorous, casual. Payback is no directorial opus magni - it is a rather routine film, which owes most of its great moments to the script and to the excellent Mel Gibson, who capitalized on his many years of experience in detective Riggs' skin, only to stand on the opposite side of the barricade. Thanks to him the incredibly stubborn thief Porter becomes a character almost humorously dangerous, who, with raw willfulness, walks through the reinforced concrete barricade for the smallest thing. The central character is the central value of Payback. We otherwise do not find anything particularly original or memorable here, everything works for the benefit of the whole and the result is a quality gangster film from the rough school that delights even with its decent ending. ()

novoten 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais The brutality suits the noir-themed crime stories well. On the journey for revenge, Gibson, as a tough guy with a steel gaze, loves a beautiful prostitute, seeks out a traitor, and encounters - uh - a sadistic dominatrix leading an Asian gang. I can't remember the last time I used that word, but Payback is a cool movie, with a perfect cold look, and some scenes are amazingly uncompromising in their brutality, but unfortunately, everything is always just tough, and throughout the whole time, I didn't experience any significant twist that would have affected me in any way. Helgeland relies on stylish form, but the essence constantly eludes him. ()

gudaulin 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais When it premiered, I gave Payback 4 stars and I must admit with a certain blush that it charmed me in its own way - and I am not a fan of the genre or even Mel Gibson. It is a film made with ease and it is straightforward, simple, genre-pure, and a cool ride where the pace never slackens and the usual clichés are presented tastefully and with a pervasive sense of irony. On the other hand, as the years went by and I read the book, it impressed me much more with its darkness, complexity, and ambiguity. Besides, it is impossible not to notice how the film approaches the character of the violent, murderous, and thieving protagonist, presenting him to the viewer as a likable rascal. This story is hard to believe, and I left behind my teenage years when I would have identified with this portrayal a long time ago. Overall impression: 60%. ()

3DD!3 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais A stylish noir-gangster movie with a persuasive Mel Gibson in the lead role of a hardened thief, Porter. Helgeland managed to reproduce the exact atmosphere of most of Donald E. Westlake's books (Payback was based on "The Hunter" published under the pseudonym Richard Stark) and shows a world full of villains, junkies, hookers, corrupt cops, sadists and just plain idiots with whom the main character encounters. Accompanied by a sarcastic voice-over monologue, Porter slowly works his way to his seventy thousand dollars which was stolen from him by his partner Val and his wife. The way in which he eliminates all obstacles is simply cool, and you have to keep your fingers crossed for him even if you don't want to. After a while you don’t mind the plot’s predictability, and that you’ve seen this somewhere before, as you get carried away by a world that's as hard as scotch-soaked kidneys, but also damn relatable. My personal Top 20. ()

Kaka 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Genre-wise Payback is essentially an unclassifiable film. It doesn't have a classic plot, it doesn't distinguish between good and evil, and it also doesn't map out the actions of the main characters. Mel Gibson is a man of moral principles and that's where it ends, he can't be called either “good” or “bad”, and perhaps that's exactly what makes Payback such a stylish ride. Of course there is also a polished formal side (filters, sets, cinematography) and a few gems (sadomasochism, a parade of bosses, corrupt cops, etc.) that cannot be overlooked and are captivating matter what you think of them. The plot is basically banal, but everything works like a well-oiled machine. Brian Helgeland is damn well aware of the squalor of the material and doesn't give the viewer a chance to realize this fact, bombarding them with one stylized shot after another and with main characters so interesting that it's hard to believe. ()

lamps 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais A brilliantly built-up thriller with a pace that is simply unreal in the second half. And yet so little is enough... Just steal $140,000 (no, sorry, just $70,000) from Mel Gibson and you'll unleash the kind of carousel of murders, shootouts and badass one-liners that we only remember from the first Die Hard. Gibson shines in his role and enjoys it to the fullest, but the supporting characters are also given a memorable portrayal by the actors, whether I'm thinking of the bad guys Henry, Kristofferson and Coburn or the pretty sharp hooker Lucy Liu. Simple, straightforward, harsh – just the way it should be. ()

Goldbeater 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Finie la plaisanterie. Un film néo-noir grandiloquent dont la distribution est mémorable et pertinente et le dénouement impeccablement élaboré (un rare cas où l’intervention du studio influence le film positivement, ce que je peux dire après avoir vu la version du réalisateur Payback: Straight Up qui, elle, me semblait malheureusement plus faible…). Je ne me lasserai jamais de le revoir ! C’est l’un de ces films que l’on a toujours envie de se repasser. Cinq étoiles ! ()

kaylin 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I've always liked Mel Gibson and in this tough thriller, where he plays an action hero, he simply fits. The whole thing is stylized, as if it was almost shot based on a comic book. It was based on a novel, but the visual side was managed well. It's properly tough, the story is not completely stupid, on the contrary, it's quite elaborate. I liked this movie once and nothing has changed even after some time. ()