Mystic River

Mystic River est un sombre thriller policier, lié par une étude approfondie des personnages. C'est un film lent, silencieux et minimaliste en termes de musique, qui n'est certainement pas un film d'action, mais plutôt un drame humain sérieux, peut-être même encore plus profond à la fin que Mystic River. Visuellement simple, le film repose principalement sur les acteurs et le montage. Les ciseaux auraient pu être plus actifs, mais ce sont les acteurs qui le sauvent. (06/11/2003)

A very impressive work that has artfully combined the virtues of psychological drama and detective story, with the blending of the two genres in a very gritty finale being one of the greatest pros of Eastwood's film. The first part feels rather clumsy and takes on revolutions more than laboriously, but in the end, thanks mainly to Sean Penn, the narrative engine kicks in successfully, and as the minutes progress, Mystic River becomes a truly magnetizing spectacle, which, while not surprisingly deep in storytelling or extremely masterful direction, amounts to only honest and interesting narratives, great acting performances and emotional moments. The strength of the story lies primarily in the central three-petal, in the internal dilemmas and scars that protagonists have carried with them since childhood and which influence their actions... Unbalanced, but excellent. (24/07/2005)

A chamber psychological thriller that relies on a very high-quality cast and reliable, experienced direction from Clint Eastwood. It is not a film that would cause any revolution in cinematography or bring me to ecstasy with its processing; on the other hand, it does not have any significant flaws and represents a significant above-average film in its genre. Overall impression: 75%. (28/12/2007)

It's not satisfying as a classic crime drama, but it is as a psychological drama. The film flows at the slow pace of a lazy river, there are no camera exhibitions, Clint directs artfully, giving a lot of space to actors who can show a lot of their range, and that's how I like it. Tim Robbins in particular dominates the performances, and here the Oscar is in the right hands. On the other hand, I would question the second award-winning actor, because Sean Penn, in truth, overacts in places. The intelligently written story manages to draw you in and not let go, although there are a few distracting elements, namely, the wife's strange silent phone calls to Detective Devin (played convincingly by Kevin Bacon), which have no connection to the plot and take it nowhere, and the poor symbolism in Robbins' character's reasoning – I didn't get the "vampires" (= pedophiles?) thing. Nevertheless, great satisfaction, also thanks to the unconventionally closed story. They don’t make many films like this in Hollywood today. (29/10/2005)

Thanks to Sean Penn's performance (not only in the formally perfect scene of finding the victim), the film is better than it would be without him. The crime story mixed with a heartrending drama holds up more than solidly until the finale, which unexpectedly escalates minute by minute and pulls many surprises on the viewer. Although you will understand what that river in the title is looking for during it, the previous atmosphere collapses in that instant. (27/03/2006)