Résumés(1)

Londres, les années 60. Les jumeaux Reggie et Ronnie Kray, célèbres gangsters du Royaume-Uni, règnent en maîtres sur la capitale anglaise. À la tête d'une mafia impitoyable, leur influence paraît sans limites. Pourtant, lorsque la femme de Reggie incite son mari à s'éloigner du business, la chute des frères Kray semble inévitable... (StudioCanal)

(plus)

Critiques (8)

POMO 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Le seul film dans lequel vous verrez Tom Hardy donner une gifle déculottée à un garçon nu lors d'une fête gay. L'homosexualité de l'un des frères est également à l'origine de la scène la plus drôle du film (la première rencontre avec le mafieux de Las Vegas, Chazz Palminteri). Un film divertissant sur la vie des gangsters, mettant davantage l'accent sur l'exhibition cool des acteurs principaux que sur l'intrigue dramatique. La relation entre les frères et leurs différences, bien gérées par Hardy, sont le moteur du film. J'ai également apprécié la représentation du côté obscur rétro de Londres à la manière des films de gangsters américains (Scorsese). La deuxième moitié du film aurait pu être accélérée, mais je lui donne quand même quatre étoiles. Pour la diversité de la performance en double de Hardy, que j'ai tout simplement appréciée plus que je ne m'y attendais. ()

Malarkey 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Tom Hardy felt like a dual role and a dual role he got. And truth be told, he did a more-or-less good job portraying the two brothers, who are both criminals and who are each a little different. It’s a pity that the movie only starts getting really interesting once their entire empire begins to crumble apart. At that point, Legend capitalized on the entire story, which was otherwise not that interesting, and the movie prepared a rather tragic unravelling of the plot. And that was good. Mainly because the story was written by life itself. I actually felt really sad at the end of the movie about the human tragedy. ()

gudaulin 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Organized crime in the USA had its golden years during the Prohibition era, while British organized crime had its most famous period in the 1950s and 1960s when London temporarily became the center of the world. The center of attention for tabloids and the public became the unmistakable Kray twins, who not only filled the pages dedicated to criminal offenses but also influenced fashion and socialized with showbiz stars. This is already the second film attempting to portray their life stories, and it must be said that Brian Helgeland managed to extract more than his predecessors. However, there is a problem from the audience's perspective - the film somewhat misleads them. The beginning follows a Tarantino-like style, and after the twins massacre a rival gang in an emotional collaboration, it seems like it will be a bloody and suspenseful ride. However, the film subsequently turns into a psychological drama, where one of the brothers' partners comes to terms with the knowledge that she has aligned her life with a sociopath, whose twin is a pure psychopath. It basically addresses the issue of Mrs. Schroeder from Atlantic City Mafia, who gets involved in a love affair with mafia boss Thompson and becomes entangled in the center of organized crime, fighting an endless battle between her conscience and her value system against the environment that surrounded her. The film is shot beautifully as a retro from the 1960s, showing that British cinematography is very capable. Many genre fans might sigh at the fact that the storyline following the Krays' growth, their domination of new neighborhoods, and the cleansing of the city from competition would be much more appealing to the audience. Overall impression: 80%. Tom Hardy lived up to expectations with his dual role. It may not be a big hit and will not rank high in the genre, but it has its good qualities. ()

3DD!3 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Those of you who don’t like Hardy must take off two stars, because it is the acting performances that pull this rather standard gangster movie to new heights. Legend is too long for the little that happens in the movie. Either they should have shortened it, or draw out the Cray Bros. Odyssey into a miniseries. Not at all a bad movie, but it had much more potential. Amongst the competition - Peaky Blinders on TV - at the theater any Scorsese is the second from the back. Hardy’s Reggie and Ronnie are the pack-horses of this movie and worth every penny. The more I think about it, the character Emily Browning character perhaps unnecessarily slowed things down and bringing in a human touch. Helgeland is still good at his job, but can do better. ()

Kaka 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Brian Helgeland should stick to writing scripts, because when he's behind the camera, his films have no drive and the result is bland. And that is doubly unfortunate for a retro gangster movie like this, as the form is OK, there aren’t life wisdom and truths, and there’s even less Chazz Palminteri, and the film's plot structure is just there because it has to be. Otherwise, it's Tom Hardy's one-man-show, and a very brilliant one at that. If I wanted to watch an appetiser and a main course in one night, I'd go with Legend and maybe Goodfellas. ()

lamps 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais The only thing that puts this intimate gangster retro flick in the flattering company of the "must see" is Tom Hardy's flamboyantly chameleonic creation. The adage that life itself writes the best scripts doesn't apply here, because Helgeland has written a simple cinematic story flattened to the very worn out theme of "bad guys rising up", with the weight of the entire emotional and psychological aspect resting on Tom Hardy's performance – he makes the film work and not only makes it fun to watch, but also very fun to listen to, whether it's the arrogant teasing of the cops or gangsters or the irresistibly over-the-top sexual innuendo (Tom Hardy becomes the coolest gay man in movie history with this one). The imaginary tinsel of the past film year doesn’t belong to DiCaprio, Cruise or Pratt, it belongs to "Mad" Hardy. 70% ()

Othello 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais A rhetorical question grasped at the right end of the rope, "What else is missing from a good crime thriller with Tom Hardy?" Another Tom Hardy, of course! And what else on earth could a good crime thriller with two Tom Hardys be missing? (geez I sure took on a challenge) Emily Browning. Mm mmm. Three goals before the game has even started isn't entirely fair, but times are fair to the crooked, and with the team being ruled by the steady hand of proven coach Helgeland, I'd put my money on this one anyway. A hard-edged, stylized biopic that at times throws pure gold at the audience (the mobster's people's court) and then again isn't afraid to lie to the audience about what they’re seeing. Perhaps the only detriment is the obvious fact that the director of Payback had to be kept on a leash again, because more than once he can be seen wanting to step on turf that is clearly marked with signs that read "Do Not Enter! Love, Your Producers." However, for the promise of a director's cut and the once again incredible Hardy... Well, I can't help it. ()

kaylin 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Tom Hardy is absolutely mesmerizing in a dual role and one wonders why he didn't receive an Oscar nomination for this film. 2015 was definitely his year, even though he didn't win any major awards. The films with him were fantastic and "Legend" was also quite successful, especially in how it portrays the self-destruction of the brothers. By the way, excellent depiction of London in that time period. ()