Cheval de guerre

Regard nostalgique sur la phase la plus poignante du cinéma. Voici de la poésie filmique pour ceux qui se souviennent – peut-être la dernière du genre. Avec une vingtaine de minutes en moins, ç’aurait été l’un des meilleurs opus de Spielberg. Le fait que ce soit l’une de ses réalisations les plus personnelles se ressent dans toutes les scènes. (26/02/2012)

A much more unbearable film than I could have ever expected. Technically speaking, it’s good, of course, but the dialogues are a pain to listen to, the main characters are unlikeable (all of them, and the main teenage redneck most of all), the story is driven by either chance or the stupidity of the characters, and the whole lot is so awfully pathetic and kitsch that it made my head spin. I think the world around us is full of better stories and I don’t understand why anyone should care whether one mare will be reunited with an unlikeable young guy or not. And, if the animal in this film intentionally and consciously (!!!) sacrifices itself in order to help its friend, and people actually believe it and are moved by it… something is bloody wrong in this world. It’s been long since something pissed me off so much. Two stars for the technical aspect, but unfortunately, Spielberg is no longer guarantee of quality mainstream entertainment. (13/01/2012)

A film about love, goodness and horses, in which the Great War also looks many times more pathetic and moralistic than in all of the anti-war pamphlets of the 1920s and 1930s. Paradoxically, this is not a problem at all - the main drawback of this captivating spectacle is Spielberg's absolute fondness for the surface. Everything inner and psychological disappears from the shots - everything is taken over by a rich visual arrangement. People and horses are explicitly props in the creator's professorial exhibition. Moments of emotion always and again come across the same thing - it's not the human (horse) story that impresses us, it's rather the respectable audiovisual construction, under which (unlike Steven's famous films) there is nothing at all, just a genre vacuum. This is simply not enough for a fairy tale, which War Horse is more than anything else. (20/02/2012)

This is going against the flow a little, but my problem with Warhorse isn’t that it’s a “chintzy Hollywood Spielbergesque tearjerker", but that in the end it isn’t like that at all. But that’s what it’s trying to be; too much, in fact; it is made like that but in its core it lacks the foundation to all movies like this - emotions. The bond between Albert and Joey is so slap-dash; it is ground up into mini-stories that blend into one; in the end I didn’t give a damn about either of them or about the movie either. And the movie should either have been much shorter (and just about those two) or should have been a regular mini-series, where each episode could tell one of the ten-minute escapades we see here. (15/01/2012)

A moment of a colorful children's book, a moment of war hell and a moment of odyssey. Spielberg, with a relative bet on certainty, knows how to surprise and although the thoroughness or interconnectedness of individual episodes sometimes heavily stumbles, I still have to nod approvingly with a slight reservation. Considering how grand and consequently unfortunately slightly prolonged the film War Horse feels, it probably couldn't have been aimed more precisely. There are too many characters and moods here, and the plot either needed to be shortened by a third or stretched by an hour. The positive resonance resounds the loudest thanks to Williams' amazing main theme and a few touching moments, against which there is no defense. 70% (25/02/2012)

This is a pretty special movie for me and I must say that I really enjoyed it. Spielberg filmed this in his own way and it ended up so that every scene looks like a poster. Some scenes stand out incredibly. The ride through the battlefield is the most powerful scene of the movie, thanks to John Williams’ music too. Sometimes maybe half of the good feeling from the movie comes from the somebody sitting next to you. (27/02/2012)

War Horse follows in the footsteps of The Red Baron and the Flyboys. A wave of renewed interest in WW1 would be a great thing, it would just have to be based on films that aren't such failures. The memory of Düsseldorf will be more eternal and colorful than a sunset in all shades of orange. (23/02/2012)

Spielberg did what Cameron did years ago when he was filming Titanic, War Horse is not a groundbreaking in terms of plot, it’s a rather classic story, but Steven indirectly winks at us and suggests that this is how the true blockbuster films of the silver screen used to be made, with real emotions that are not often seen nowadays. The film aesthetics, the camera work, the lighting, etc. are also not standard that I would call them old-school. Therefore, it is a tribute to the old school. Whether it works in the end, everyone has to decide for themselves. For seasoned film enthusiasts, fans of the work of an eternal child, and the older population, War Horse will be a nostalgic escape from everyday reality. For the rest, it will probably just be a tedious bore, which half will consider as pathetic. Spielberg filmed what he wanted and did it very well. The scene with the horse against barbed wire is gripping. (25/03/2012)

Steven Spielberg in the saddle! Still. And this time, literally. He holds the reins tight and... All right, I'll drop the horse analogies. Unfortunately, with War Horse, it's as I thought it would be. Many viewers were probably expecting a war battle sequence with non-stop action, a camera dirty with mud and blood, piles of dead... And they didn't know that Spielberg was adapting a book for slightly older children. So this is absolutely (in the best sense of the word) an ideal substance for him. He brought it to the screen with everything he had, and if the film deviates from Morpurgo's text, it's only for the best (the book, for example, is written in the first person and narrated by a horse, which also means that we don't see any battle scenes like the incredibly gripping trench battle Albert experiences in the film). That the Dartmoor scenes are pastel and kitsch to the point of shame? Yet their contrast with the war scenes stands out all the more. That Albert and Joey's intimate relationship makes anyone laugh? Haven't you ever had an animal and talked to them for hours? Isn't what many people call "zoophilia light" called friendship? And that's what War Horse is all about. It's an ode to friendship. The friendship of people with people, people with horses and horses with horses. When one sees how soldiers in different uniforms take care of horses with exactly the same love, one cannot even mind that the English, Germans and French do not speak their own languages, but English to a man... After all, they are all the same people, pitted against each other by a few powerful bastards who one morning wanted to start a war. There are a number of powerful and memorable scenes in the film (both the "light-hearted" ones, such as the ploughing or the car race, and the "warlike" ones, especially the cavalry charge, the windmill and the top sequence with the horse running through the raging "no-man's land" and culminating in the cutting of the wires) and I had no choice but to watch them contentedly, listen to the divine John Williams as I like him best, be moved now and then and clap my hands in spirit. I didn't know the runtime beforehand, but I honestly wouldn't have guessed that the whole adventure lasted 150 minutes. It passed so quickly and was so beautifully warm in the end. (02/03/2012)

I have no choice but to write that Spielberg did not disappoint again. At first I was a bit worried, because there have already been a lot of films about horses and the space for filmmakers to tread with this subject is slowly shrinking, and I couldn't stand the extremely unlikeable and dull Irvine after a few scenes. Fortunately, we have the best director ever behind the camera. The story slowly gains momentum, Irvine disappears from the scene and the futility of war is depicted all the more strongly because Spielberg has already taken a slightly different view of those horrors and is no longer so focused on commercial success as he was before. War Horse is a beautiful film that should warm every viewer's heart, and the happy ending is delivered in a precisely measured way that manages to move without marring the overall picture and atmosphere. The taste of the story will stay on my tongue for a long time and it’s definitely a film I would like to repeat. (19/01/2013)

I am not a big fan of Steven Spielberg, although I acknowledge that he has done a lot for the film industry. His movies like "Duel" or "Jaws" are great examples of quality thrillers/horrors. I also appreciate some of his other films, but in recent years, he has not made anything noteworthy. They are good films, but none of them are as breathtaking as they used to be. "War Horse" definitely isn't. I would compare Steven to Robert Rodriguez. Robert occasionally - perhaps too often - feels the need to make simpler family films. His "Spy Kids" series has a total of 4 parts, and I wouldn't be surprised if we see more. Similarly, Steven makes family films that are dramatic, tearjerking, and quite different from his "more adult" work. "E.T. - The Extra-Terrestrial" became a hated film for many, but it had its qualities. "War Horse" just wants to present a big little story about a horse. Yes, the horse really is in the lead role, in a two-and-a-half-hour movie. But Steven softened, and even though the movie takes place during World War I, don't expect anything similar to "Saving Private Ryan". No war violence, just a family spectacle that tries to be dramatic but comes off as incredibly sentimental. This is definitely not my cup of tea. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/08/lode-stud-zoo-marylin-pulnoc-v-parizi.html (24/02/2013)