Résumés(1)

Valerie Plame, agent de la CIA au département chargée de la non-prolifération des armes, dirige secrètement une enquête sur l'existence potentielle d'armes de destruction massive en Iraq. Son mari, le diplomate Joe Wilson, se voit confier la mission d'apporter les preuves d'une supposée vente d'uranium enrichi en provenance du Niger. Mais lorsque l'administration Bush ignore ses conclusions pour justifier le déclenchement de la guerre, Joe Wilson réagit via un éditorial dans le New York Times déclenchant ainsi la polémique. Peu après, la véritable identité de Valerie Plame est révélée par un célèbre journaliste de Washington. Avec sa couverture réduite à néant et ses contacts à l'étranger en danger de mort, Valerie voit s'effondrer sa carrière et sa vie privée. Après des années au service du gouvernement américain, elle va devoir maintenant se battre pour sauver sa réputation, sa carrière et sa famille. (UGC Distribution)

(plus)

Critiques (4)

POMO 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Le réalisateur Liman a réalisé un métier de conversation décent et la chimie entre Naomi Watts et Sean Penn dans 21 grammes n'a rien perdu de son dynamisme cinématographique. Cependant, comment dois-je être intéressé / amusé par la résolution d'une crise conjugale sur fond d'événements politiques complexes autour de la Maison Blanche, que même les Américains eux-mêmes ont probablement oubliés ?? Un film étonnamment sans audace, ennuyeux et insipide. ()

Isherwood 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais The Green Zone of bureaucracy. After the jump tragedy, Liman has returned to effective direction that fully serves the story, with this one earning points especially in the moments when both spouses are under maximum pressure from everywhere. Watts and Penn are great. Nowadays, not many movies are made that are smart, resolutely commenting on recent political decisions. Thumbs up. ()

Marigold 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais A film without priorities, where one topic walls off another, it does not let the exciting questions of the essence of democracy sound fully (it always eclectically beats them with another dull side path) and thus, to its detriment, instead of provocativeness, it slides to typical phrases about a non-existent alternative to the current (certainly problematic) system of government - the guilty are the powerful ones, and the citizen wins, because he always somehow invokes his rights. In fact, I wouldn't mind the conciliatory undertone if the film wasn't boring with its ever-changing perspective. Liman is not Greengrass, and Powell's entourage also gives a very tired and anemic impression. I don't have a problem with conversational thrillers, but this is just a parlor debate that quickly excuses a few of its provocative theses with some kind of industrious patriotism. In fact, it's a completely useless film that tries to criticize something it's trying to defend and preserve in the same breath. From this, it simply cannot but become gray with hints of interesting places. I almost suspect that the creators did it deliberately so that the subject wouldn't sound so controversial. ()

Kaka 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I wanted at least one uncompromising cold-blooded action silly film, but I didn't get it. Liman directs extremely economically, without unnecessary theatrical escapades and pseudo-cool shots. Fair Game is a fair story based on the truth that doesn't pretend to be more than it is. And it's basically an average story of false accusation, where we encounter quite fiery topics of the recent past and the fact that Liman cleverly plays with events of the past and kind of winks at White House members. A bit like Oliver Stone, hidden behind an action camera and minimalist music. Extraordinary, but not action-packed. Naomi Watts is captivating and Sean Penn is consistently good except for one scene. ()