Shutter Island

"Shutter Island" est un peu comme une sélection de films de De Palma - il ne convient pas à tout le monde, mais ceux qu'il attrape, il les abat. Cela a commencé par un voyage et l'arrivée sur une île mystérieuse, qui, en termes de caméra, de montage et d'utilisation d'une musique rétro effrayante dans le style de Miklós Rózsa, représente également un manuel d'étude précieux pour créer une ouverture de film absolument captivante, comme le débarquement initial dans "Il faut sauver le soldat Ryan". Et cela s'est terminé non pas tant par un retournement de situation qui a inversé l'intrigue précédente (ce scénario, d'ailleurs, n'est pas si original dans le monde du cinéma), mais par son ajout - la dernière scène et la dernière réplique du film, qui a propulsé "ce thriller avec DiCaprio, qui attire les foules" trois étages plus haut. On peut reprocher à tout ce qui se trouve entre l'introduction et la conclusion une touche parfois kitsch, une orientation exagérément désorientée entre réalité et hallucinations (ce qui soulève quelques questions troublantes), ou une approche froide des personnages. Mais tout cela fait partie du jeu rusé du réalisateur, qui ne vise pas les frissons des maniaques dans les cellules du bloc C, ni l'émotion sentimentale face au destin du personnage principal. Parce que ce réalisateur joue avec une tout autre corde sensible. +++ Après avoir visionné pour la deuxième fois, mes mains tremblaient comme après avoir fumé un paquet de cigarettes du Dr Cawley. Un film exceptionnel d'une autre dimension métasensorielle. (15/02/2010)

“I’ve seen something like it before.” I’m going to throw out some spoilers, so it would be better if you read this after seeing the film. On the first viewing, until the lengthy explanatory passage, Shutter Island is a paranoid crime thriller that draws on Hitchcock’s legacy and horror B-movies. On the second viewing, it is an atmospheric drama laden with the questions that Scorsese has posed throughout his entire filmography (What’s worse, emotional or physical violence? Is it better to stay in one’s accepted role or to reveal one’s true face? To accept guilt or let it consume you?). Unfortunately, the second viewing reveals not only the well-thought-out distribution of clues leading us to the final revelation, but also the film’s inability to work on both levels simultaneously. The pleasure of a skilfully shot, though not entirely smoothly flowing genre movie (the shots don't fit together as elegantly as in Casino, for example) is disrupted by long dialogue scenes in which the Big Issue is addressed, which Scorsese is again unable to properly elaborate on, because he would deprive himself and us of the pleasure taken from the presence of trashy add-ons like Nazis, mass murder, a mysterious lighthouse and a lobotomy. In short, he spoils the fun by trying to squeeze something more out of it, which is manifested in the significant reduction of the funny verbal exchanges between Chuck and Teddy from the book on which the film is based (and which, incidentally, can be read in one breath both as a genre treat and as a suspenseful story that may conceal something more). Therefore, I find it more inspiring to watch Shutter Island, even at the cost of a slight overinterpretation, as a multi-level psychoanalytical treat for all followers of Žižek (Teddy constantly moves between different floors, which we can see as “levels” of his mind; familiar with Teddy’s dreams, Dr. Cawley personifies the subconscious; Chuck, addressing Teddy as “boss”, conversely represents his – seemingly – controlled ego) which with its narrative is – probably unintentionally – reminiscent of a video game (restarting the mission, collecting objects and solving riddles, Teddy as Laeddis’s game avatar…). Choose what makes more sense to you. Regardless of its faults, one visit to Shutter Island will almost definitely not be enough. 85% (30/08/2012)

The last time I felt this much enthusiasm from perfect filmmaking in a new film was with Inglorious Basterds. From the moment they arrive on the island, it was clear that this would be an exceptional film, tailor-made for me – sometimes you just know it from the very first scene. Scorsese builds the atmosphere masterfully (shots on details, striking music, visual tricks of various crap flying around), I couldn’t find a single weak spot; Shutter Island is 130 minutes of concentrated depression, mystery and madness. Regarding the complaints of certain viewers about the lack of originality, or rather, the predictable twist, it’s worth mentioning that what they believe is a twist, it’s not so, it’s just the resolution to a classic misleading plot (in that sense, the film can only have two outcomes, and you don’t have to be a genius to “figure out” the right one) that only serves to lay down the ground for the real twist, which is very inconspicuous, original, and clever. Putting all this together, Shutter Island is for me more interesting than all of Marty’s famous gangster films. (25/02/2010)

For perhaps the first time ever, Martin Scorsese doesn't tell a story but rather glues together scenes that are more like visual masturbation by him and the cinematographer. The actors (DiCaprio is traditionally great, and so is Mark Ruffalo, despite being unnecessarily kept in the back,) do their best and deliver fine dialogues, but the plot doesn't go anywhere, the film lacks any tension, and the characters drown in having to run around the island confused and in the cheap memories of Dachau. Also, waiting almost two hours for the point seems pretty damn cheap for a director who was originally supposed to sell it as the polished thriller of the year. With all due respect to the master, this is a bad and tediously boring film through and through. (21/03/2010)

The key questions are: does Shutter Island offer anything more than a well-built but remarkably unbalanced genre story? Isn't the feeling of confusion that comes after watching it actually just a reflection of the inner emptiness of the story that was told? Does the shocking point not only explain, but also justify all the wonders (logical, spatiotemporal and ideological) of the previous events? I can’t say that I’m closer to the answer YES... Which is quite a sad outcome for M. Scorsese's film. Despite the absorbing atmosphere, despite DiCaprio, despite some really great moments, I'm far from appreciating the creative game, however much I am able to accept it. I shake my head helplessly over a work that is a much more effective trick than a thoughtful manipulation. Perhaps if the film stayed away from stray attempts to overlap and admitted without torture that it was ONLY a pure, and at its core a blunt genre film, I would have left the movie theatre more satisfied. (15/02/2010)

Scorsese still knows how to set the right atmosphere, this is a great piece of craft and everybody is acting beautifully, so this movie isn’t just about the message. And luckily so, because after just about ten minutes there would be nothing left to watch. Despite this, I still couldn’t get that niggling thought out of my head that this should have been an episode of Tales from the Crypt and not a hundred and forty minute feature movie. If it weren’t for the opening crossing to the island and the closing approx. thirty seconds, I wouldn’t remember anything at all of this. (19/02/2010)

I'm still struggling to find words the day after the screening. The meticulously crafted screenplay is still spinning in my head, the performances are in front of my eyes, and Martin Scorsese, after the average "The Aviator" and the misstep named "The Departed", is excelling so much that it takes my breath away. He plays with Hitchcock, with Kubrick, screams his love for old films to the world, and squeezes me every few minutes. At one point, I almost burst into tears out of helplessness, and a few minutes later, I am almost killed by the escalating tension. And the whole time, he has an unbelievable control over me, leading me through every corner of Shutter Island as he pleases. At this late stage of his filmography, it is the absolute pinnacle, and at the same time, a diamond that I come back to in my memories like to few others. (18/03/2010)

That one movie can cause so many chills down your spine? Very nicely thought out and put together. Leo is really one of a kind and the ending is magnificent. Just maybe cut 10 minutes here and there. (07/02/2011)

After an hour, you start to get a sense of what it's actually like, though you may have your doubts (which is fine) – you just need to have seen a few films with similar themes. Still, it's solidly made, the acting is good, some scenes are really good, but as a whole it was too long and didn't draw me in enough to forget the long running time. A very strong 3 stars. (13/08/2017)

Everything that Avatar could not provide me, namely a strong story, well-developed characters, and real tension, Shutter Island was able to deliver in abundance. No director has played so well with me since Fight Club, and I haven't had such a comprehensive film experience in a long time, despite watching a number of good films in the recent past. A smart screenplay, excellent camera work, carefully chosen exteriors, an outstanding cast, and impressive performances. A combination of all the elements of filmmaking. Martin Scorsese is an experienced filmmaker and this is the culmination of his long career. Individual scenes and significant twists in the film, such as the confrontation in the fortress or the final confrontation at the lighthouse, will resonate with me for a long time. Shutter Island is a meticulously crafted drama with numerous elements of classical psycho-horror. An emotional affair with a variety of interesting characters. This film is a strong contender for my biggest cinematic experience this year. I have nothing substantial to criticize about Scorsese's film. Overall impression: 100%. This is what honest classic filmmaking should be. (03/03/2010)

This is simply a movie for pleasure. Marty plays about with absolutely everything. He plays with the music, period stylization, the storytelling and the actors play along with him. The atmosphere is thick as fog in the opening scene. Drooling psychopaths winking out on every street corner, storms rage and the road to the main message (which you can probably guess) is a winding one and goes through an impressive range of exquisite twists, turnabouts and unexpected situations that keep your eyes glued to the screen. Add some dark dreamlike hallucinations and rather forgotten memories of the main protagonist during the second world war. DiCaprio acts as if his life depended on it, maybe this is one of his best performances of his career, but even so he can hardly compare with the old vets who finally landed a superb parts. Despite how you might expect the movie to evolve, the ending is crushing and the last sentence in Shutter Island is the icing on this beautifully served cake. (11/03/2010)

A technically and atmospherically brilliant piece of work – I wouldn't expect anything less from Scorsese. Script-wise, it's basically what I expected – standard. It’s stuff we’ve seen several times before and there isn't anything particularly outstanding. Thankfully, there is that last sentence which elevates the film to above average. (29/05/2010)

I hesitate. My main problem = I read the book. Thus, I missed out on all the surprises that made Shutter Island great for other people to watch, and I had to rely on the mind of Mr. Scorsese and his actors. The director didn't disappoint me in the sense that he knows how to shoot nice pictures, play with different camera angles, pay tribute to Hitchcock and even handle a plot that basically has no dull spot. The actors were also OK (I just imagined Chuck much, much differently). But where did they lose the atmosphere of the book regarding all the shut-in lunatics? I devoured every page, I was tense from the beginning to the end, my head was spinning... None of this happened to me in the film - even the riveting passage set in Block C didn't look extravagant on the screen. And again, I say - maybe it's because I've read the book. I was most disappointed that the filmmakers decided to leave out the (important) motif of rats, which are very important in the book - we lost a very thoughtful metaphor. Well, whatever. Shutter Island is a well done piece of craftsmanship, but for those who read the book first, it will probably serve mainly as an illustration for the book. In the end, I give it three and a half. (10/07/2010)

A film like from another world, hard to digest in only one screening and with a lot of question marks. What I missed the first time, however, Scorsese paid back after second viewing, and with interest. A masterfully crystallised script, a carefully constructed atmosphere, great performances and a powerfully uncomfortable setting on a bleak rocky island, all this accompanied by one of the best soundtracks of the last few years. From the very first seconds, the master's direction gives the impression that we’re watching something really big and unusual, and every scene seems to suggest that we have already seen it all and nothing could surprise us, only to be covered by a thick veil of uncertainty and mystery in the next moment. DiCaprio is great in the lead role, and has definitively shredded the huge ego of the teen idol; likewise veteran Ben Kingsley with his captivating gaze, but he doesn't have to convince anyone of his acting qualities anymore. Shutter Island will never be groundbreaking for me, and its incoherence of thought is not the right nut to crack in my cinematic diet, but it still managed to captivate me for more than two hours and I was like in a trance awaiting the final reveal, which puts a very appealing, but for my taste too prolonged and overly glossy crown on the artfully glued puzzle. 80% (01/09/2012)

A masterpiece that captivates the audience with its tense atmosphere. The film is accompanied by serious music, rainy scenes, horror hallucinations and horrific sounds, creating a sense of anticipation and almost hopelessness. The director and creative team excelled in their choice of music and effects, which adds to the immersive experience. Shutter Island is an unforgettable cinematic experience that is well worth watching. (13/08/2012)

For the second time, a clear 5 stars. One great director, one charismatic and mature actor, stunning cinematography, and one great psycho. A round of applause. Most of the "thrillers" of the last few years have been shoved aside by Shutter Island. And one more thing – the flashbacks were without flaw! (09/03/2010)