Résumés(1)

Martin Vail, avocat médiatique et cynique, décide d’assurer la défense d’Aaron Stampler, un jeune provincial timide et bègue, accusé d’avoir sauvagement assassiné l’archevêque de Chicago, qui l’avait pris sous son aile. Martin est convaincu de l’innocence de l’enfant de chœur, jusqu’à ce qu’il découvre, en menant sa propre enquête, les pratiques immorales de l’ecclésiastique, dont Aaron était la victime. Deux heures durant, ce thriller psychologique tient en haleine grâce à son scénario retors et sa mise en scène efficace. À l’instar de l’orgueilleux Martin Vail, instrumentalisé alors qu’il se pense maître de la situation, le spectateur est manipulé de bout en bout, jusqu’au twist final, mémorable. Face à Richard Gere, remarquable de sobriété, Edward Norton retranscrit toute l’ambivalence de son personnage par sa capacité à changer de visage en un rien de temps. (Arte)

(plus)

Critiques (10)

novoten 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Thanks to Norton's fascinating performances, it is a solid spectacle that disappoints in all other aspects. Gere's discussions on honor are futile, just like the courtroom scenes, and Laura Linney matures into a charismatic and likable woman several years later. Fortunately, the finale picks up momentum and reaches the ending I expected and wanted. Without moralistic lectures, it is a decent snack, but ultimately forgettable. ()

gudaulin 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais If there is something perfect that deserves a five-star rating about this film, it is definitely Edward Norton's performance in the role of a man accused of murdering a celebrity. In his debut, he showed immense potential with his talent and both critics and film viewers were amazed by him. He has certainly rightfully ranked among the most significant names of his acting generation. I have no problem with Richard Gere in the lead male role either, who is, although two or three levels worse than Norton, still good enough, and above all, Gere was perfectly cast in a role that he masterfully controls, and he has experience in portraying these types of self-confident elegant characters. However, what bothers me is the screenplay. It's the typical Hollywood construction that tries to manipulate the viewer as much as possible and prepares a "shocking" twist at the very end. That is exactly what pleases many film fans on the other hand. It's not about the fact that the perpetrator plans 20 moves ahead because every top chess player does that. It's rather about the fact that the brilliant plan counts on the reaction of many involved parties, which cannot be accurately predicted in reality, and if their reactions were to deviate even slightly from the assumptions, the perpetrator would end up in the electric chair very quickly. Not to mention that according to my indirect knowledge, this is not how the American justice system truly works. Overall impression: 65%. ()

3DD!3 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais An excellent thriller with great acting performances (an awesome Edward Norton) and a very nice ending that takes it all to an even higher level. I was also pleased to see the friendly face of Terry O'Quinn from Lost. ()

Kaka 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Although quite uninteresting thematically, in the end it is a solidly directed one-off from typical 1990s production. That is, during a time when Richard Gere was still a sensation and elegant, not playing tormented policemen or morally conflicted middle-aged men. Moreover, it is perhaps the first time that Edward Norton also appears on the big screen, playing his part phenomenally – though the entire screenplay, which relied primarily on his performance and role, was ultimately somewhat predictable. But this does not change the fact that the film is definitely worth seeing for those who enjoy lawyers and courtrooms, as there are several excellent scenes along those lines. ()

lamps 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Very strong 4*. Thrillers set mostly in courtrooms may smack of boredom, but I have the best experience with them and I always enjoy watching them. Moreover, Primal Fear is one of the better films in this category. The plot is the kind that has been rehashed a hundred times, but it’s excellently executed and brilliantly supported by the truly great performance of Edward Norton. He literally shines here and, in my opinion, adds a different dimension to the concept of a movie psychopath. Of course, Richard Gere also deserves praise, he doesn’t disappoint in the lead role and portrays the character of the arrogant lawyer very well. The dialogue is tolerable and meaningful to a given extent, and although the story is rather tedious and flows along slowly, it’s easy to follow, and after watching it, the positives in the form of the actors and also the direction clearly prevail. ()

Goldbeater 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Percutant. Étonnamment brutal dans certains détails pour un thriller grand public. Un film qui assure à tous les niveaux et dans lequel on découvre Edward Norton à ses débuts, lequel parvient, du haut de son rôle secondaire, à faire de l’ombre à la star établie qu’était à l’époque Richard Gere. Et cet état de fait correspond parfaitement au ton du film. Chapeau ! ()

Necrotongue 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais As much as I dislike lawyers, I do agree (albeit begrudgingly) that we need them. I didn't mind Martin Vail as the lawyer character, I just didn't like Richard Gere who played him. He’s an extremely overrated actor; I’ve always thought of him as more of a sleazy type. The film had an interesting theme, and while I have some reservations concerning the execution, they are just minor gripes. What I’d like to highlight is Edward Norton's superb performance which was the pillar of the film. Aaron/Roy didn’t get that much screen time, but his scenes were the reason why I’m giving the film four stars. The rest of the actors seemed like they were only there as support for the actual main character. / Lesson learned: Everyone has the right to defend themselves, no matter how much it pisses me off in some cases. ()

Remedy 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais There's this "90's vibe" that I can't quite put a name to, but it definitely had an effect on me throughout the film. Maybe it's because the exteriors were shot a little differently back then, the soundtrack used to be more restless/nervous than bombastic, and the atmosphere could be very imaginatively evoked even just by a "nighttime run" through the backstreets of the Big Apple. I got a bit nostalgic; but now to the substance. Norton is absolutely fantastic, Gere satisfactory, Laura Linney good within reason. The script is mainly designed so that the actors have something to work with, and there's no shortage of twists and turns, which actually feel quite tidy in the end and don't necessarily feel contrived or like a bet on a "shocking denouement". Gregory Hoblit was then able to use his craftsmanship to create an extremely suspenseful courtroom drama that can be considered the pinnacle of its genre. In addition, he de facto discovered and brought to wider awareness Edward Norton, who went on to create some memorable characters in the late 1990s. For me, this is the best Hoblit. ()