Wolf Hall

Adaptation of a better original, because while Mantel often pays too much attention to descriptions, wordy sentences and chatter, Straughan's screenplay takes full advantage of the original. And the original has a large potential. That is for sure. In any case, for both the original and the adaption it is true that there is nether introduction nor explanation of anything. It is hard to find more incomprehensible historical topic for the "general public". Find out for yourself what was done of duty, and what does or does not look hopeless. While the "CVs" of the main characters and the fundamental events around them are well known in the Czech republic, the procession of dozens of nobles from god knows where might be a problem for Czechs. A general picture obtained from Wikipedia is definitely not enough. And although it is about seemingly the same as the recent Tudors show, the result could not have been more different. I can only say the well-known saying "when two do the same thing, it is not the same thing ". The two approaches/series do not compete in anything; if anything at all, on the contrary, they complement each other. After all, here the time, events, characters and behind-the-scenes plotting are basically sidelined, because everything here no matter what revolves only around Cromwell´s career, spiritual and personal life. And if you don't consider Cromwell to be one of the most prominent political figures (not only) in British history, there's no reason for you to start watching this successful (and deliberately lengthy; this must be taken into account) and controversial show (Cromwell is usually portrayed as a charismatic statesman, but here he is portrayed rather as a pen pusher that is hard to understand). (01/03/2015)

Wolf Hall describes events that are among the most well-known and frequently depicted in the history of medieval Europe, both in popular culture and in literary works. The reign of Henry VIII and his romantic affairs were, after all, a challenge even for Shakespeare himself. Wolf Hall offers a different perspective, as the creators of the series view the events at the royal court through the lens of one of the most interesting figures in English history - Thomas Cromwell. Cromwell, who was considered insignificant by the powerful feudal lords due to his humble origin, gradually rose to the top of the power ladder thanks to his extraordinary abilities, strong nerves, and political instincts. The casting of the main character greatly contributes to the series. Mark Rylance's portrayal of Cromwell is compelling and exudes authority and Rylance's minimalist acting style is perfectly suited for the role. Perhaps the best characterization of his Cromwell can be found in two brief dialogues: "What will you do now, Moore?" - "Write a lot and also pray." - "I recommend writing less and praying considerably more." And the second: "You are a capable man, Cromwell. It's a shame you're a Lutheran." - "Come now, I am a banker, after all." The series does not distort history and proves that great stories do not necessarily need to be twisted and embellished to fit the imaginations of Hollywood screenwriters. The production design is also a strong point, as it is definitely not a cheap production with poor visuals. Overall impression: 90%. (14/06/2017)

I didn’t read up on the film so I was expecting another variation on the Henry-Anne theme. To my pleasant surprise, it was mainly about my favorite éminence grise, Thomas Cromwell, played absolutely fantastically by Mark Rylance. Fortunately, the creators avoided unnecessary action and created an excellent conversational drama. I would have appreciated at least two more episodes. Then the plot wouldn't have to be so condensed. (23/06/2017)