The Constant Gardener

  • Grande-Bretagne The Constant Gardener (plus)
Bande-annonce 3

Résumés(1)

Diplomate britannique sans envergure en poste au Kenya, Justin Quayle passe le plus clair de son temps à choyer les plantes de son jardin, coulant des jours heureux avec son épouse Tessa, une humanitaire militante et idéaliste. Lorsqu'elle se fait sauvagement assassiner dans la brousse en compagnie de son ami Arnold, un médecin travaillant pour une ONG, tout porte à croire qu'il s'agit d'un crime passionnel. Mais les circonstances étranges qui entourent la mort de sa femme poussent Justin à mener l'enquête. Il se rend vite compte que Tessa et Arnold s'intéressaient à des tests pharmaceutiques menés sur la population locale et conduits par des firmes multinationales... (Arte)

(plus)

Vidéo (3)

Bande-annonce 3

Critiques (8)

POMO 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

français Une drame incroyablement sérieuse et incroyablement bien réalisée, après laquelle je ne serais pas étonné si la menace actuellement proclamée de la grippe aviaire n'était qu'une fausse bombe médiatique, conduisant à l'enrichissement des compagnies pharmaceutiques grâce à la vente de vaccins préventifs. Ce film est à la fois une critique de la commercialisation de notre société et une histoire d'amour triste entre deux bonnes personnes qui s'y opposent. Ces deux aspects se rejoignent dans un drame long et initialement assez froid, mais qui progressivement infuse le sang dans les veines et aboutit à une belle conclusion. La caméra "tremblante" du génie Greengrass, en plus des filtres efficaces (Londres froidement sombre / Afrique éclatante en rouge et jaune) contribuent grandement à l'effet. Des performances d'acteurs brillantes de Rachel Weisz et Ralph Fiennes. Un film qui n'a pas besoin de larmes pour être beau. ()

Annonces

Isherwood 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais An incredibly shot thriller that intelligently grafts an uncompromising indictment of big pharmaceutical companies making millions off of disease-ridden Africa in a basic conspiracy shell. Director Meirelles manages to bring this optic of social issues into focus in such a way that even viewers least familiar with the topic will feel that they just untied the Gordian Knot, and the intelligence officer does not have to have a heart attack even with the (inevitable) simplification of the whole intricate machination. It’s a perfectly balanced blend of compelling content, well-managed form (authentic handheld camerawork), and, as a bonus, the excellent acting tandem of Fiennes and Weisz. After Hotel Rwanda, the developed world received another unflattering postcard signed with "Africa." ()

Lima 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais Of the many recent political dramas commenting on contemporary problems of civilization, this film is one of the best, along with Syriana. This one deals with the problems of today's Africa, with the growing influence of multinational pharmaceutical companies and the harmful interference by corrupt officials and governments in the work of NGOs. Unlike the somewhat aloof and cold Syriana, however, Meirelles's film is told more clearly (without a barrage of names) and, thanks to the big theme of love beyond the grave, is more emotional, including an impressive ending that lifted the final impression to the absolute. I didn't think Rachel Weisz's performance was Oscar-worthy, but I kept the scenes with her in front of my eyes even after the film was over. Maybe I’m in love? :) ()

gudaulin 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais A socially critical drama set in the environment of Sub-Saharan Africa, where wealthy countries gladly export their waste and problems. I don't consider the film's motif as excessive, although it is necessary to emphasize that it is not always wise to put pharmaceutical companies in a difficult position. Researching new medicines is damn expensive and uncertain, so, for example, widely spread ideas that companies should distribute their products for free, would lead not so much to a decrease in profit (which the companies would ensure otherwise), but rather to a halt in the development of new medicines. As for bypassing strict security measures in research, patients themselves often have an interest in reducing waiting time and receiving timely help. While Ralph Fiennes is convincing in his role as an acting chameleon and it is truly a joy to watch him at times, Rachel Weisz reaches the limits of her acting abilities and the chemistry between the married couple does not work for me as it should. I also have a problem with the behavior of the film's characters, for example, the final act of resignation and passive waiting for execution somehow doesn't make sense. It's a decent film, but I never considered giving it four stars. In addition to the points mentioned above, the film deserves a more critical edit - at least 15 minutes could easily be sacrificed out of those 130 minutes. Overall impression: 60%. ()

Photos (50)