Before Sunset

Au début, un résumé des dialogues déconcertant des idées avec lesquelles je me réveille et m'endors tous les jours. Ensuite, un dialogue "romanesque" incroyablement charmant et pétillant avec une fin qui mérite des applaudissements. Richard Linklater, Ethan Hawke, Julie Delpy, vous êtes divins ! (05/07/2004)

I saw it shortly after the end of Before Sunrise, and at first, I was a little scared that they wouldn't be able to recreate the atmosphere. Fortunately, every sentence spoken gains meaning over time, every casual conversation can take on a different dimension, and suddenly Celine says, "Because of that damn book..." and I break down into molecules just like Jesse. The second watching elevates Linklater's work to unforgettable and, in its more mature but no less magical storytelling spirit, is able to grasp the viewer and fill them to the brim with emotions and experiences. (30/01/2006)

Even though the film is only 80 minutes long, I got pretty bored at times. Some of the dialogue was rather uninteresting. Maybe it was because I hadn't seen Before Sunrise and had nothing to draw on. On the other hand, I like how realistically it's filmed. I'm not a big fan of Julie Delpy, but she works well here. Both act naturally and handle their roles well. 3.5 stars. (30/11/2011)

I'll admit I haven't seen the first movie this one follows. But since this one only loosely follows it, it doesn't matter. I wasn't bored. I enjoyed watching them, listening to them. The whole movie I was tense about how it would end up, because sometimes the expressions the actors threw around were completely ambiguous... :-D Weaker 4* (17/09/2010)

I have the opposite experience with Linklater's film trilogy than most other viewers. I didn't watch the first part and I gave the second a chance, but I didn't find any great enchantment in it, and it was only the last part that really interested me. With the exception of the opening scene in the bookstore, Before Sunset can be considered an endless dialogue between two people, where the scenery changes only a few times in 80 minutes. I have always liked dialogue-driven films, but here I feel that Linklater is testing the limits of my patience. The conversations between the duo in search of each other in the second part are not as narratively banal as in the first, but I don't find any depth in them by any means. Overall impression: 55%. (29/04/2018)

The cleverly written dialogues are brilliantly delivered by both Ethan Hawke and his partner Julie Delpy. The film avoids sentimentality and romantic clichés, it captivated me with its simplicity and naturalness, while remaining interesting every second. (18/01/2005)

When those two look at each other, you immediately know that this will be beautiful. Those two simply fit perfectly together and their meeting is magnificent. After nine years, they see each other for the first time, after she didn't fulfill her promise and wasn't at the place where they were supposed to meet for six months. However, he came. After nine years, they have the opportunity to talk again and to say what they want. Both of them are incredibly believable, the camera lets them speak, it walks in front of them as they walk through Paris, capturing their words as if it were capturing the meeting of two real people who haven't seen each other in nine years. A beautiful romance. Beautiful. (03/12/2013)

CONTAINS HINTS OF SPOILERS. This is where I first noticed that the flamboyant cuteness of Celine from the first installment can be toxic, unfortunately. All the insecurities and would-be complex thought processes from the first installment begin to culminate here, and Celine unfortunately profiles as a neurotic and indecisive girl who will be dissatisfied in any circumstance. With herself, with her life, with her lack of "true, spontaneous" love, or with anything else – sadly, you can really put anything in there. I should point out that I am a man and that women may have a different opinion on this very tricky and sensitive subject, which I fully respect. But despite my personal criticisms of her toxic character here, I still found her very likable. The interaction and chemistry in her conversations with Jesse worked almost as well as in the first one, and I was still rooting for them quite a bit. I humbly have to admit though, a little less than in the first installment. It just wasn't the huge wow it was before, but I was still thoroughly entertained and devoured every word. Bravo, Mr. Linklater. (21/12/2017)