Lolita

La version de Lyne de Lolita est plus complexe dans la représentation des émotions du personnage principal, Humbert, que la version de Kubrick. Le spectateur reçoit son récit tragique de manière plus poétique, à travers l'expression rêveuse et la voix de Jeremy Irons, soulignées par la mélancolie de Morricone. Le prologue se marie si harmonieusement avec l'épilogue après toutes ces souffrances émotionnelles… Le deuxième atout de Lyne est une représentation plus ouverte mais toujours délicate de la relation intime du couple. Le choix de moins se concentrer sur la mère de Lolita et sa relation avec Humbert était également judicieux, car cela n'avait de sens chez Kubrick que comme substitut à ce qu'il ne pouvait pas montrer à son époque. J'apprécie aussi le personnage plus discret du démoniaque Quilty. Dans l'ensemble, un film plus convaincant et satisfaisant que l'« original ». (18/09/2020)

I know exactly what I will feel when I see Lolita again. I will be in awe of the enchantingly seductive Dominique Swain, I will have tears in my eyes for the longing for Lolita, and for two hours, I will be Humbert, who would sacrifice and abandon everything for another moment when Dolores will be in his arms. What Irons delivers in the lead role is not just good acting, it is the complete embodiment of the character, perfect harmony with the character's nature, and the materialization of all male passions and desires, even in any unhealthy form. So when I see Lolita again through his eyes, I will feel the love that changes lives. (25/06/2005)

A poetic film with a brilliant performance by Jeremy Irons and the actress playing Lolita, who might even deserve an Oscar. Some moments are truly captivating, but towards the end, the excitement and enthusiasm quickly fade away. (25/06/2004)

Since some time had passed since I saw the first adaptation, I took the time to revisit Lolita. And I actually like this better. The 1940s are portrayed very authentically (similarly well as later in On the Road), and even the key prologue from the 1920s feels very natural. The details are almost genius in places, such as in the selection of magazines and comics that Lolita and her lover read. Lolita herself is very lively, real and sexy, and not as artificial and affected as Sue Lyon was years ago. Jeremy Irons is great, at times almost vulnerable in his infatuation and tough and mean in his scenes with adults. But it’s too bad that a lot of scenes with Melanie Griffith were cut because, after all, the resulting film is too tight and seems to take place only between the main couple. As originally filmed, the scenes with Lolita's mother helped anchor the story in reality, and their reduction moved the whole towards a more dreamlike tone. (26/10/2019)