Les Lumières du faubourg

  • Finlande Laitakaupungin valot (plus)
Bande-annonce
Finlande / Allemagne / France, 2006, 78 min

Réalisation:

Aki Kaurismäki

Scénario:

Aki Kaurismäki

Photographie:

Timo Salminen

Acteurs·trices:

Janne Hyytiäinen, Maria Järvenhelmi, Maria Heiskanen, Ilkka Koivula, Sergei Doudko, Andrei Gennadiev, Arturas Pozdniakovas, Matti Onnismaa (plus)
(autres professions)

Résumés(1)

A l'instar des personnages de vagabond qu'affectionnait Chaplin, le personnage principal, Koistinen (Janne Hyytiäinen), arpente le pavé à la recherche d'une petite place au soleil, mais l'indifférence générale et la mécanique sans visage de la société se liguent pour briser ses modestes espoirs les uns après les autres. Un groupe de bandits exploite sa soif d'amour et son poste de veilleur de nuit avec l'aide de la femme la plus calculatrice dans l'histoire du cinéma depuis «Eve» de Joseph L. Mankiewicz, ils organisent un cambriolage dont Koistinen est rendu seul responsable. Et voilà Koistinen privé de son travail, de sa liberté, et de ses rêves. Heureusement pour lui, l'auteur du film a la réputation d'être un vieil homme au cœur tendre, on peut donc espérer qu'une étincelle d'espoir illuminera la scène finale. (Pyramide Distribution)

(plus)

Critiques (1)

gudaulin 

Toutes les critiques de l’utilisateur·trice

anglais I am sympathetic to Aki Kaurismäki's intimate social melodramas and I have given some of them a 4 out of 5 rating. In the case of this film, he did not change his creative method and style, but he took one of his typical creative traits to the extreme, i.e., his interest in various kinds of outsiders. World cinema is full of nobodies, desperate people, and failures, but they usually have some sympathetic qualities that make you root for them simply because you feel sorry for them. Koistinen is by no means the biggest outsider you could come across in today's cinema; someone like Max Horowitz from the film Mary and Max by Adam Elliot is much worse off, whether it's his loneliness or his overall miserable existence, and yet you feel much closer to that character and root for him. With this film, the problem is that the main protagonist is simply a self-centered idiot. He has been one in the past, he is one now, and within a few minutes, it becomes clear that he will remain one in the distant future as well. And for all his bumbling, inability to communicate, and lack of self-reflection, he has only himself to blame. Identifying with such a character is a matter for masochists. If you find yourself saying vengefully, "Hit him one more time and finally finish him off, so he can be done with it," then something is not right. It could still be seen as an analysis of a certain type of human being, if the plot's development corresponded to the logic of the characters. But it's all just a directorial construct because there was no need to send Koistinen to prison and there was no need to deprive him of another job. The director simply wanted it that way and didn't feel like coming up with a plot that would move the story forward. Overall impression: 25%. ()